Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Sonrisa Care

The Gables

13 St Marys Road, Netley Abbey, Southampton, SO31 5AT

Goodpublished 6 May 2026, 3 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2023

Rated Inadequate and placed in special measures; inspectors found people at risk from unsafe care, weak medicines systems and poor oversight.

This was an unannounced focused inspection. Inspectors visited on 6 and 9 November 2023, spoke with people, relatives and staff, and checked care, medicines, recruitment and management records.

The inspectors found serious problems with safety. Risks such as falls, skin damage, nutrition and diabetes had not always been assessed. Safeguarding concerns were not always investigated or referred, and medicines were not always given or recorded safely.

The home was mostly clean and there were enough staff. People and relatives spoke positively about the care staff, the food and the manager. However, the systems meant to identify problems, learn from incidents and check care were not reliable.

The overall rating fell from Good to Inadequate. The home is in special measures, so CQC will keep it under review and normally re-inspect within six months. If it does not improve enough, CQC may take action to prevent the provider from operating the home.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and familiar staff

    People and relatives were positive about the care staff. People said staff knew them well and responded when they used the call bell.

    People told us they were happy and had their care needs met by care staff who knew them well.from the report
  • Enough staff

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs, and recruitment checks had been completed safely.

    Staff had been recruited safely into the service and there were enough staff to meet the needs of the people living at The Gables.from the report
  • Food and choice

    People had a choice of food and their dietary needs were catered for. The cook understood people's nutritional needs.

    People spoke positively about the food and drink they received at The Gables.from the report
  • Clean communal areas

    The communal lounges and bathrooms were mostly clean on the inspection days, although infection-control systems still had important gaps.

    The home was found to be mostly clean in communal lounges and bathrooms on the days of our inspectionfrom the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • People were at risk of harm

    serious

    Incidents including falls, injuries and a high-risk medicines error were not always investigated or referred to safeguarding authorities. The home did not have a reliable process for learning from incidents.

    People had been harmed or placed at risk of harm without external scrutiny of the home.from the report
  • Unsafe risk management

    serious

    Risk assessments were missing for areas including falls, skin integrity, nutrition, oral hygiene and diabetes. Inspectors also found an exposed sharp metal pipe and an uncovered radiator in areas people used.

    People had been placed at risk of avoidable harm.from the report
  • Medicines were not always safe

    serious

    Instructions and records for as-required medicines, sedatives, creams and eye gels were incomplete. This meant people could receive medicines late, unnecessarily or after they should have been discarded.

    People had been placed at risk of harm from medicines that were not managed properly and safely.from the report
  • Consent and capacity records

    serious

    Records did not show that consent had been sought for care. Mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions were missing for some restrictions, including bed rails and a lap belt.

    The Gables did not ensure it obtained people's consent to care and treatment.from the report
  • Staff training was out of date

    needs fixing

    Staff had not received all the training needed for people's care needs, including diabetes, catheter care, pressure care and positive behaviour support. Staff did not always receive supervision.

    Staff had not been provided with the training necessary to meet the needs of the people living at the homefrom the report
  • Poor management oversight

    serious

    Audits and governance systems did not identify or correct widespread problems. Staff were not always clear who was responsible for key tasks when the manager was away.

    There was a lack of governance and oversight of The Gables, this had led to shortfalls and people had been harmed and were at risk of harm.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What immediate changes have been made to assess and manage risks involving falls, skin damage, diabetes and unexplained injuries?
  2. 02How are safeguarding incidents, falls and medicines errors now reported, investigated, referred and reviewed for lessons?
  3. 03Can you show how medicines such as sedatives, blood-thinning medicines, creams and eye gels are now checked and recorded?
  4. 04How have you completed decision-specific mental capacity assessments, consent records and best-interest decisions for people subject to restrictions?
  5. 05What up-to-date training and supervision have staff completed for the needs of the people living here?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led, prompted by concerns about safe care and governance; the report also gives an Effective rating and discusses consent and staff training, while it gives no separate ratings for Caring or Responsive. This explanation was written from the published report of 21 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of The Gables

4 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Inadequate.

  1. December 2023Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from Good
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Inadequate

    Read what inspectors found at The Gables

  2. November 2018Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. January 2018Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. November 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. November 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. October 2013

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 1 October 2013.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Southampton

Abbey House

Southampton, SO31 · 0.2 km
Good
Residential
Rated 3 years agocare home

Woolston Road

Southampton, SO31 · 0.6 km
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home

Netley Court

Southampton, SO31 · 0.7 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 20 months agocare home

Waterside House

Southampton, SO31 · 1.2 km
Not yet rated
NursingDementia
Not yet ratedcare home

Rowan Close

Southampton, SO31 · 1.9 km
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home