CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Churchill Residential Care And Nursing Homes
St Judes Nursing Home
29-31 Mayfield Road, Sutton, SM2 5DU
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- People told inspectors they felt safe. Risk assessments, staffing, medicines management, recruitment checks and infection control were found to be suitable.
- Effective?
- Good
- People's physical, mental and social needs were assessed. Staff were trained, but supervision meetings were brief and not always as regular as the home's policies required.
- Caring?
- Good
- People and relatives described staff as kind, compassionate and respectful. Inspectors saw staff spending time with people and supporting their choices, dignity and independence.
- Responsive?
- Good
- Care plans were personalised and kept up to date. People were supported with activities, communication, relationships, complaints and end-of-life wishes.
- Well-led?
- Good
- Inspectors found approachable leadership, an open culture and effective systems for checking care quality, medicines, records, incidents and staff training.
What inspectors found, December 2023
Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with supervision meetings not always as regular as required.
The inspection visits took place on 27 and 28 November 2023. One inspector spoke with people, relatives, staff and a healthcare professional. They also reviewed care records, staff files, training information, medicines records and other documents.
The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found people were safe, medicines were managed safely, staffing levels were suitable and infection control procedures were followed.
People and relatives described the care as kind and respectful. Care plans were personalised and activities supported people's interests and relationships. The home had effective checks on care quality and a clear focus on person-centred care.
Inspectors noted that staff supervision records showed meetings were brief and not as regular as the home's policies required. The manager had recognised this and had started introducing a new format and record.
People felt safe
People and relatives told inspectors they felt safe. Staff understood safeguarding procedures and how to report concerns.
“People were protected from harm. There were effective safeguarding policies and procedures linked with those of the local authority.” from the report
Kind and respectful care
People and relatives gave consistently positive feedback about staff kindness, compassion and respect. Inspectors also observed staff treating people kindly.
“We observed staff treated people with kindness through the inspection, spending much time sitting and talking with them and playing games as requested by people.” from the report
Personalised support
Care plans recorded people's needs, preferences, backgrounds and important relationships. Staff supported people to make choices and maintain independence.
“Care plans were personalised, detailing health needs, backgrounds and people who were important to them.” from the report
Activities and relationships
The home supported people to stay engaged, follow their interests and maintain relationships with relatives and friends.
“People's lives were enriched by staff helping them to remain engaged and stimulated, to fulfil their wishes, to follow their interests and to take part in activities appropriate to them.” from the report
Strong quality checks
The home used regular checks and audits to monitor care, medicines, incidents, records, training and people's health.
“There was a wide ranging and effective governance system in place.” from the report
Staff supervision was not always regular
needs fixingSupervision records showed that discussions were brief and meetings did not happen as regularly as the home's policies required. The manager said improvements were being introduced.
“Supervision records indicated discussions in these meetings was brief and the sessions were not as regular as the service's policies and procedures required.” from the report
- 01How often are staff supervision meetings now held, and how do you check that the new supervision system is working?
- 02How will you support my relative's individual communication needs and choices if they cannot easily express themselves?
- 03What activities would be suitable for my relative's interests, abilities and background?
- 04How will you involve our family in care plan reviews and decisions about care?
- 05How are falls, infections, weight loss or skin problems monitored and acted on?
This was an inspection of all five key questions, including infection prevention and control, with visits to the home on 27 and 28 November 2023. This explanation was written from the published report of 22 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of St Judes Nursing Home
3 rated inspections over 9 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.
- December 2023Goodcurrent ratingSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- April 2021Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- December 2017Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- June 2015GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- November 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- July 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- September 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- August 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- October 2011
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 21 January 2011.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.