Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by SignHealth

SignHealth Constance Way

SignHealth, 2 Constance Way, Leicester Place, Leeds, LS7 1HX

Goodpublished 9 February 2024, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found that medicines, safeguarding, infection control, recruitment and risk management were generally safe. They found some missing records about mental health support, and room temperature checks for medicines had not initially been completed, but checks were put in place immediately.
Effective?
Good
This question was not rated in this inspection. The report says staff supported people in line with the Mental Capacity Act principles, but mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions were not always documented.
Caring?
Good
This question was not rated in this inspection. People and relatives gave positive feedback, and inspectors observed warm and positive interactions between people and staff.
Responsive?
Good
This question was not rated in this inspection. Care was described as person-centred, with detailed communication information, regular care reviews and activities chosen with people's involvement.
Well-led?
Good
Inspectors found supportive management, regular reviews and an improvement plan. However, some medicine and care-plan audits had not identified issues found during the inspection, and the home's registration did not include its work with people with learning disabilities.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2024

SignHealth Constance Way was rated Good; inspectors found safe, person-centred care, but some records and quality checks needed improvement.

This was an unannounced inspection. The inspection activity ran from 15 to 29 January 2024, with a visit on 15 January. One inspector and a British Sign Language interpreter carried out the inspection. They spoke with five people, one relative and staff, observed care, and checked care, medicine, staff and management records.

The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found that medicines were generally managed safely, risks were understood, staff were trained and able to communicate using British Sign Language, and the home was clean. People were supported to be independent, including with some medicines, activities and community involvement.

There were some weaknesses. Support for mental health needs was not always recorded. Mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions were not always documented as required by the home's policies. Audits had also failed to identify some medicine and care-plan issues. Inspectors made a recommendation about recording mental capacity decisions.

What inspectors praised
  • Communication and staff skills

    The home had a consistent team with appropriate training. Staff communicated with people using British Sign Language.

    People were supported by a consistent team who had the appropriate skills and training. All staff communicated with people using British Sign Language.from the report
  • Person-centred care

    People were involved in reviewing their care, choosing activities and making decisions about meals. They were encouraged to be independent and develop their skills.

    People were encouraged to be independent and enhance their skills.from the report
  • Positive relationships

    People and relatives spoke positively about the care and management. Inspectors saw warm interactions, and people said they felt listened to and respected.

    People told us they felt listened to and respected by staff.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Some care was not recorded

    needs fixing

    Inspectors found examples where mental health monitoring and support had not been recorded. The manager acted after this was raised.

    We found a couple of examples where monitoring and support provided in relation to people's mental health needs had not been recordedfrom the report
  • Mental capacity records

    needs fixing

    The home was following the principles of the Mental Capacity Act, but decision-specific assessments and best-interest decisions were not always recorded in line with its own policies.

    However, decision-specific mental capacity assessments and best interest decisions were not being documented in line with the provider's own policies.from the report
  • Quality checks missed issues

    needs fixing

    Medicine and care-plan audits had not found some of the problems identified by inspectors. The management team was taking action through its improvement plan.

    Some improvements were required with medicines and care plan audits as these had not identified some issues found during this inspection.from the report
  • Mixed staffing feedback

    minor

    Staffing levels were judged safe and inspectors found no evidence that people's needs were unmet. However, people gave mixed feedback, including that the home had been a little short staffed, and there had been recent staff changes.

    Some people commented on always enough staff being on shift, other people told us there had been recent changes in staffing and one person told us the service was "a bit short staffed".from the report
  • Registration needed updating

    needs fixing

    The home was supporting people with learning disabilities, but this was not included in its registration. The manager said immediate action would be taken to update it.

    The providing was caring for people with learning disabilities, but this was not included in their registration.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you now record support and monitoring for people's mental health needs?
  2. 02How do you record decision-specific mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions?
  3. 03What changes have been made to staffing since the recent staff changes, and how do you make sure there are enough staff on each shift?
  4. 04Has the home's registration been updated to include support for people with learning disabilities?
  5. 05How have medicine and care-plan audits been improved so that they identify problems promptly?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led; the report does not give new ratings for Effective, Caring or Responsive. This explanation was written from the published report of 9 February 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of SignHealth Constance Way

3 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. February 2024Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at SignHealth Constance Way

  2. September 2017Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. July 2016Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. May 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 19 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by SignHealth

4 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Nearby

Other care homes near Leeds

Hillside House

Leeds, LS6 · 2.1 km
Requires improvement
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home