CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by SignHealth
SignHealth Constance Way
SignHealth, 2 Constance Way, Leicester Place, Leeds, LS7 1HX
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- Inspectors found that medicines, safeguarding, infection control, recruitment and risk management were generally safe. They found some missing records about mental health support, and room temperature checks for medicines had not initially been completed, but checks were put in place immediately.
- Effective?
- Good
- This question was not rated in this inspection. The report says staff supported people in line with the Mental Capacity Act principles, but mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions were not always documented.
- Caring?
- Good
- This question was not rated in this inspection. People and relatives gave positive feedback, and inspectors observed warm and positive interactions between people and staff.
- Responsive?
- Good
- This question was not rated in this inspection. Care was described as person-centred, with detailed communication information, regular care reviews and activities chosen with people's involvement.
- Well-led?
- Good
- Inspectors found supportive management, regular reviews and an improvement plan. However, some medicine and care-plan audits had not identified issues found during the inspection, and the home's registration did not include its work with people with learning disabilities.
What inspectors found, February 2024
SignHealth Constance Way was rated Good; inspectors found safe, person-centred care, but some records and quality checks needed improvement.
This was an unannounced inspection. The inspection activity ran from 15 to 29 January 2024, with a visit on 15 January. One inspector and a British Sign Language interpreter carried out the inspection. They spoke with five people, one relative and staff, observed care, and checked care, medicine, staff and management records.
The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found that medicines were generally managed safely, risks were understood, staff were trained and able to communicate using British Sign Language, and the home was clean. People were supported to be independent, including with some medicines, activities and community involvement.
There were some weaknesses. Support for mental health needs was not always recorded. Mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions were not always documented as required by the home's policies. Audits had also failed to identify some medicine and care-plan issues. Inspectors made a recommendation about recording mental capacity decisions.
Communication and staff skills
The home had a consistent team with appropriate training. Staff communicated with people using British Sign Language.
“People were supported by a consistent team who had the appropriate skills and training. All staff communicated with people using British Sign Language.” from the report
Person-centred care
People were involved in reviewing their care, choosing activities and making decisions about meals. They were encouraged to be independent and develop their skills.
“People were encouraged to be independent and enhance their skills.” from the report
Positive relationships
People and relatives spoke positively about the care and management. Inspectors saw warm interactions, and people said they felt listened to and respected.
“People told us they felt listened to and respected by staff.” from the report
Some care was not recorded
needs fixingInspectors found examples where mental health monitoring and support had not been recorded. The manager acted after this was raised.
“We found a couple of examples where monitoring and support provided in relation to people's mental health needs had not been recorded” from the report
Mental capacity records
needs fixingThe home was following the principles of the Mental Capacity Act, but decision-specific assessments and best-interest decisions were not always recorded in line with its own policies.
“However, decision-specific mental capacity assessments and best interest decisions were not being documented in line with the provider's own policies.” from the report
Quality checks missed issues
needs fixingMedicine and care-plan audits had not found some of the problems identified by inspectors. The management team was taking action through its improvement plan.
“Some improvements were required with medicines and care plan audits as these had not identified some issues found during this inspection.” from the report
Mixed staffing feedback
minorStaffing levels were judged safe and inspectors found no evidence that people's needs were unmet. However, people gave mixed feedback, including that the home had been a little short staffed, and there had been recent staff changes.
“Some people commented on always enough staff being on shift, other people told us there had been recent changes in staffing and one person told us the service was "a bit short staffed".” from the report
Registration needed updating
needs fixingThe home was supporting people with learning disabilities, but this was not included in its registration. The manager said immediate action would be taken to update it.
“The providing was caring for people with learning disabilities, but this was not included in their registration.” from the report
- 01How do you now record support and monitoring for people's mental health needs?
- 02How do you record decision-specific mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions?
- 03What changes have been made to staffing since the recent staff changes, and how do you make sure there are enough staff on each shift?
- 04Has the home's registration been updated to include support for people with learning disabilities?
- 05How have medicine and care-plan audits been improved so that they identify problems promptly?
This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led; the report does not give new ratings for Effective, Caring or Responsive. This explanation was written from the published report of 9 February 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of SignHealth Constance Way
3 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.
- February 2024Goodcurrent ratingstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- September 2017Goodup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodWell-led: Good
- July 2016Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- October 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- May 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 19 January 2011.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by SignHealth
4 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.