Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by T Lewis

Rosedene Nursing Home

141-147 Trinity Road, Wandsworth Common, London, SW17 7HJ

Requires improvementpublished 16 January 2026, 7 months ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2023

Rosedene Nursing Home was rated Good; inspectors found safe, well-managed care, although some people said they did not always feel safe.

This was an unannounced focused inspection on 30 November and 1 December 2023. Inspectors looked at Safe and Well-led after concerns about an increase in incidents involving people being harmed. They spoke with people, visitors, staff and professionals, observed care, and checked care plans, medicines records, staff files and management records.

The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe recruitment, clean premises, good infection control and well-managed medicines. Staff understood people's risks and responded calmly to distress. The home worked with health and social care professionals and reviewed incidents, complaints and safeguarding concerns.

Some people and a relative said they felt unsafe because of another person's distressed behaviour. The managers said they knew about the issue and took action to find a more suitable placement. Inspectors found no evidence during this inspection that people were at risk of harm.

What inspectors praised
  • Calm responses to distress

    Staff knew people's routines and risks. Inspectors saw them respond promptly and calmly to potentially harmful incidents.

    These incidents were potentially harmful to everyone involved and the staff dealt with them in the most professional, calm, and dignified way.from the report
  • Enough suitable staff

    Staffing matched the rota during the inspection and people received the support they needed. Recruitment checks included identity, right to work and DBS checks.

    People were supported by enough staff to meet their assessed needs.from the report
  • Medicines managed safely

    Inspectors found medicines were stored, given and checked safely. The medicines records they reviewed had no recording errors or omissions.

    We found no recording errors or omissions on medicines records we reviewed.from the report
  • Clear management oversight

    Managers regularly checked the quality and safety of care, reviewed incidents and feedback, and used action plans to make improvements.

    The quality and safety of the service they provided was routinely monitored by managers and nursing stafffrom the report
  • Good partnership working

    The home worked with GPs, community nurses, behavioural support teams and local authorities to support people's care.

    The provider worked in close partnership with various community professionals and external agenciesfrom the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Some people felt unsafe

    serious

    A few people and a relative said they did not feel safe because another person's distressed behaviour could include lashing out. The provider said it had acted to find a more suitable placement.

    I don't always feel safe here because of 1 person who can lash out at others who live and work here.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What action was taken to find a more suitable placement for the person whose distressed behaviour made some people feel unsafe?
  2. 02What were the outcomes of the open safeguarding investigations being conducted by the local authority?
  3. 03How do you review incidents involving people being harmed, and what changes have been made as a result?
  4. 04Has the new electronic care planning system been introduced, and how has it improved care records and monitoring?
  5. 05How will you keep relatives informed about safety incidents, care reviews and any changes to a person's support?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; Effective, Caring and Responsive were not inspected and their previous ratings were carried over. This explanation was written from the published report of 23 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Rosedene Nursing Home

7 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has improved, from Inadequate to Good.

  1. December 2023Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Rosedene Nursing Home

  2. May 2022Good
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. August 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. July 2020Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. June 2018Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. April 2017Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. December 2016Inadequatestayed Inadequate
    Effective: InadequateCaring: InadequateResponsive: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. August 2016Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: InadequateResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. August 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. September 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. February 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  13. February 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  14. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 17 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near London

Nightingale House

London, SW12 · 1.1 km
Outstanding
NursingDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home

Southview Close

London, SW17 · 1.7 km
Good
Residential
Rated 3 years agocare home