Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by SNSB

Roop Cottage Residential Home

Wakefield Road, Fitzwilliam, Pontefract, WF9 5AN

Requires improvementpublished 22 November 2024, 21 months ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2024

Rated Inadequate and placed in special measures; inspectors found widespread risks, poor care planning and weak leadership.

The inspection was unannounced and took place over two days. Inspectors spoke with people living in the home, relatives, staff and a visiting professional. They reviewed care records, medicines records and management records.

The home was rated Inadequate in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found risks were not properly assessed, medicines systems were unsafe, staff training was not sufficient, and people's privacy, dignity, choices and daily routines were not consistently respected.

Some staff had kind and caring relationships with people. People and relatives also spoke positively about the food. However, many serious concerns had been raised before and the provider had not made enough improvement. The overall rating fell from Requires Improvement at the previous inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind relationships

    Some staff knew people well and had caring relationships with them and their families. Staff were described as kind and patient when providing care.

    Staff spoke with people in kind and caring ways. Some staff knew some of the people well and had established caring relationships with them and their families.from the report
  • Food was enjoyed

    People and relatives said the food was good, and people were shown visual choices of the food available. However, support with the timing and safety of eating and drinking was not reliable.

    The food is nice and you get plentyfrom the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Unmanaged safety risks

    serious

    People's risks were not fully assessed or followed up. Call bells were missing or out of reach, weight loss was not consistently acted on, and hazards in the building remained unresolved.

    Risks to people were not sufficiently assessed, monitored or mitigated.from the report
  • Unsafe medicines systems

    serious

    Medicines records and staff guidance were not reliable. Some records lacked photographs, some guidance for as-needed medicines was missing or unclear, and nutritional supplements were not always given as prescribed.

    Systems and processes were not in place to ensure the safe management of medicines.from the report
  • Insufficient staff training

    needs fixing

    Staff had not been trained to meet several people's needs, including autism, learning disabilities, nutrition and hydration, oral health and dementia.

    Staff were not trained to support people with autism or a learning disability.from the report
  • Dignity and privacy

    serious

    Inspectors found poor support with personal care and oral hygiene. One person's privacy was not protected, and people's independence and choices were not consistently encouraged.

    People's dignity and respect was not promoted.from the report
  • Care was not personalised

    needs fixing

    Mealtimes, personal care and daily routines were organised around staff availability. Some people remained in their rooms despite records showing they wanted to spend time elsewhere, and there were few meaningful activities.

    Care was not planned around people's individual needs, interests and preferences.from the report
  • Weak leadership and follow-through

    serious

    Managers had changed, responsibilities were unclear and there was no registered manager. Previous concerns and promised improvements had not been effectively dealt with.

    There was a lack of accountability, understanding of risks and oversight.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What immediate action has been taken to make sure call bells are available, working and within each person's reach?
  2. 02How are you now checking medicines records, as-needed medicines guidance and nutritional supplements?
  3. 03What changes have been made to ensure people receive drinks and meals at times that suit them and that choking, diabetes, weight loss and dehydration risks are managed?
  4. 04Which staff have now completed training for learning disabilities, autism, dementia, nutrition and hydration, oral health and end of life care?
  5. 05Who is currently accountable for the home, and what evidence can you show that the improvement plan is working?

The inspection was prompted by concerns about safety, nutrition, personal care, privacy, dignity and the environment, then widened to cover all five key questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 8 March 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Roop Cottage Residential Home

7 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Requires improvement to Inadequate.

  1. March 2024Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: InadequateResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate

    Read what inspectors found at Roop Cottage Residential Home

  2. August 2023Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. October 2022Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. March 2022Inadequatestayed Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. November 2021Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. February 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated
  7. August 2017Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  8. July 2016Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
  9. June 2021

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 30 June 2021.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Pontefract

Stoneybeck

Pontefract, WF9 · 1.3 km
Not yet rated
Residential
Not yet ratedcare home

Hemsworth Park

Pontefract, WF9 · 1.8 km
Requires improvement
ResidentialDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home

Victoria House

Wakefield, WF4 · 2.7 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home

Cherry Garth

Wakefield, WF4 · 3.0 km
Good
Residential
Rated 8 years agocare home