CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Laurel Bank Residential Care Home
Riseley House Care Home
Riseley Street, Macclesfield, SK10 1BW
Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.
What inspectors found, May 2024
Rated Inadequate and placed in special measures; inspectors found people at risk from unsafe care, weak oversight and incomplete records.
This was an unannounced inspection over three days. Inspectors spoke with people, relatives, staff and health professionals. They observed care and reviewed care records, staff files and management records.
The home was rated Inadequate overall. Safe and well-led were rated Inadequate. Effective, caring and responsive were rated Requires Improvement.
Inspectors found risks were not always assessed or updated after falls and accidents. Some safety equipment did not work, medicines were not always managed safely, and cleaning standards were poor. Care records and management checks were incomplete or ineffective.
People and relatives generally spoke positively about staff and the care they received. However, activities were limited, people were not consistently involved in care planning, and the provider had not completed actions promised after the previous inspection.
Kind staff
People and relatives generally spoke positively about the care. Inspectors saw staff speaking respectfully and responding sensitively when someone was distressed.
“Staff were considered and caring in their approach.” from the report
Staffing levels
Inspectors found staffing levels had improved and were suitable for people's caring needs. The home was no longer in breach of the staffing regulation.
“Staffing levels were appropriate to meet people's caring needs.” from the report
Healthcare links
The home worked with the local hospital and health professionals. People could access healthcare, and staff said the GP surgery visited regularly.
“Staff from the GP surgery visited regularly, and good relationships had been built between the surgery and the home.” from the report
Family contact
Relatives and friends could visit whenever they wanted. Inspectors saw regular visits during the inspection.
“People were supported to maintain contact with friends and relatives.” from the report
People at risk after falls
seriousCare plans and risk assessments were not always updated after accidents or falls. The home could not show that repeated falls were properly analysed or that lessons had been learned.
“Care plans were not always updated following accidents or falls to mitigate further risks to people.” from the report
Broken safety equipment
seriousSome motion sensors and alert buttons used to call for help did not work. The provider had been aware of the problem but had not put it right before the inspection.
“We found a number of motion sensors and alert buttons people used to alert staff they required support were inoperative.” from the report
Unsafe medicines management
seriousA controlled drug was found in an unlocked cupboard and had not been accounted for. Records for prescribed creams had gaps, and risks from flammable creams had not initially been assessed.
“During our checks on medicines we found a controlled drug in an unlocked cupboard which had not been accounted for as missing.” from the report
Poor management oversight
seriousAudits and routine checks did not identify or resolve risks to people, the building and care records. Promised improvements from the previous inspection had not been completed.
“Governance systems remained ineffective.” from the report
Few activities
needs fixingThere was no planned activities programme and people reported having little to keep them occupied. The provider said it was recruiting an activities coordinator.
“People informed us there was little to keep them occupied.” from the report
Limited involvement in care
needs fixingPeople and relatives were not consistently involved in care planning or asked how they wanted their care delivered.
“People and their relatives were not involved in care planning.” from the report
- 01Which motion sensors and alert buttons were not working, and can you show that all safety equipment is now checked and working?
- 02How are falls and accidents now analysed, and how do you make sure care plans are updated afterwards?
- 03What changes have been made to medicines storage, controlled drug checks and records for prescribed creams?
- 04What planned activities are now available, and how are people's interests and preferences used to decide them?
- 05How are people and relatives now involved in care planning and regular reviews?
This was an unannounced inspection prompted partly by concerns about safe care and treatment; inspectors assessed all five key questions and also checked infection prevention and control. This explanation was written from the published report of 17 May 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Riseley House Care Home
2 rated inspections over a year: the service has slipped, from Requires improvement to Inadequate.
- May 2024Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from Requires improvementSafe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate
- September 2023Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate
- October 2022
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 12 October 2022.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Laurel Bank Residential Care Home Limited
1 other service on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.