Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Exclusive Care Group

Primrose House

2 Crowhall Lane, Felling, Gateshead, NE10 9PU

Goodpublished 21 August 2025, 12 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2023

Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found better care and staffing, but medicines records and quality checks were still not reliable.

The inspection was unannounced and took place on 12 and 13 July 2023. Inspectors spoke with people living in the home, relatives and staff. They reviewed care plans, medicine records, training records and quality checks.

The home had improved since the previous inspection. Care plans, activities, support with food and drink, staffing and infection control had improved. People and relatives generally spoke positively about the care and management.

There were still important weaknesses. Records for some medicines were not complete, and records about PEG care were not always made by the person who carried out the care. Quality checks did not always find problems or ensure that lessons were learned.

The overall rating was Requires Improvement. Effective, Caring and Responsive were rated Good. Safe and Well-led were rated Requires Improvement. The home remained in breach of Regulation 17.

What inspectors praised
  • Staffing and recruitment

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs and saw that new staff were recruited safely. Use of agency nursing staff had reduced.

    There were sufficient staff on duty to meet people's needs.from the report
  • Improved care planning

    Care plans had become more personalised and included people's preferences and abilities. They were reviewed when people's needs changed.

    Care plans had been reviewed and updated so they contained more person-centred information.from the report
  • Activities and choice

    People had more opportunities to take part in activities and maintain relationships. Staff supported people to make everyday choices.

    People had more opportunities to maintain relationships and participate in activities.from the report
  • Infection control

    The home was clean and inspectors were assured that infection prevention systems were being followed, including the use of protective equipment.

    We were assured that the provider was using PPE effectively and safely.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Incomplete medicine records

    serious

    Records did not always show that topical medicines had been applied as prescribed. The provider started taking action during the inspection, but inspectors could not yet assess whether the changes were working.

    The failure to maintain accurate and contemporaneous medicines records was a breach of regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.from the report
  • PEG care records

    serious

    Records suggested that untrained staff sometimes recorded PEG procedures carried out by trained staff. Records should be completed and signed by the person who provided the care.

    Information provided to us post inspection demonstrated that this was a regular process undertaken in the service whereby untrained members of staff sometimes completed records for trained staff.from the report
  • Quality checks did not always work

    needs fixing

    Some health and safety and medicines audits did not identify problems or make sure improvements were sustained. Reviews of incidents, safeguarding concerns and complaints needed more detailed analysis.

    Although there was some reflection evident, this lacked depth and questioning of findings to ensure lessons were learnt.from the report
  • Inconsistent staff interactions

    needs fixing

    Many interactions were kind and respectful, but inspectors found this was not consistent throughout the home, particularly in one area.

    However, this was not consistent throughout the home and could be improved.from the report
  • Building improvements needed

    minor

    The home was suitable for people's needs, but inspectors said redecoration and further changes to make it more dementia friendly were still required.

    Although the home was suitable for the needs of the people living there, redecoration was still required and further enhancements to make the home more dementia friendly.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are topical medicines recorded now, and how do you check that every application is recorded correctly?
  2. 02Who is trained to carry out PEG procedures, and how do you ensure that only the person providing the care completes the record?
  3. 03What changes have been made in response to the continued Regulation 17 breach, and what evidence shows that they are working?
  4. 04How are staff interactions monitored in the area where inspectors found care was not consistently kind and respectful?
  5. 05How are you addressing staff changes, redecoration and improvements to make the home more dementia friendly?

This was an unannounced inspection that assessed all five key questions and included infection prevention and control checks; the report compares the findings with the previous inspection published in December 2022. This explanation was written from the published report of 19 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Primrose House

5 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.

  1. December 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Primrose House

  2. December 2022Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. March 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. October 2019Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: OutstandingWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. September 2018Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. April 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. November 2015

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 4 November 2015.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Gateshead

Summerson House

Gateshead, NE10 · 0.9 km
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home

Aspen Court

Gateshead, NE8 · 1.3 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 6 years agocare home

St Marks Court

Gateshead, NE8 · 1.5 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home

Philips Court

Gateshead, NE9 · 1.6 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 14 months agocare home