CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Exclusive Care Group
Primrose House
2 Crowhall Lane, Felling, Gateshead, NE10 9PU
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, December 2023
Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found better care and staffing, but medicines records and quality checks were still not reliable.
The inspection was unannounced and took place on 12 and 13 July 2023. Inspectors spoke with people living in the home, relatives and staff. They reviewed care plans, medicine records, training records and quality checks.
The home had improved since the previous inspection. Care plans, activities, support with food and drink, staffing and infection control had improved. People and relatives generally spoke positively about the care and management.
There were still important weaknesses. Records for some medicines were not complete, and records about PEG care were not always made by the person who carried out the care. Quality checks did not always find problems or ensure that lessons were learned.
The overall rating was Requires Improvement. Effective, Caring and Responsive were rated Good. Safe and Well-led were rated Requires Improvement. The home remained in breach of Regulation 17.
Staffing and recruitment
Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs and saw that new staff were recruited safely. Use of agency nursing staff had reduced.
“There were sufficient staff on duty to meet people's needs.” from the report
Improved care planning
Care plans had become more personalised and included people's preferences and abilities. They were reviewed when people's needs changed.
“Care plans had been reviewed and updated so they contained more person-centred information.” from the report
Activities and choice
People had more opportunities to take part in activities and maintain relationships. Staff supported people to make everyday choices.
“People had more opportunities to maintain relationships and participate in activities.” from the report
Infection control
The home was clean and inspectors were assured that infection prevention systems were being followed, including the use of protective equipment.
“We were assured that the provider was using PPE effectively and safely.” from the report
Incomplete medicine records
seriousRecords did not always show that topical medicines had been applied as prescribed. The provider started taking action during the inspection, but inspectors could not yet assess whether the changes were working.
“The failure to maintain accurate and contemporaneous medicines records was a breach of regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.” from the report
PEG care records
seriousRecords suggested that untrained staff sometimes recorded PEG procedures carried out by trained staff. Records should be completed and signed by the person who provided the care.
“Information provided to us post inspection demonstrated that this was a regular process undertaken in the service whereby untrained members of staff sometimes completed records for trained staff.” from the report
Quality checks did not always work
needs fixingSome health and safety and medicines audits did not identify problems or make sure improvements were sustained. Reviews of incidents, safeguarding concerns and complaints needed more detailed analysis.
“Although there was some reflection evident, this lacked depth and questioning of findings to ensure lessons were learnt.” from the report
Inconsistent staff interactions
needs fixingMany interactions were kind and respectful, but inspectors found this was not consistent throughout the home, particularly in one area.
“However, this was not consistent throughout the home and could be improved.” from the report
Building improvements needed
minorThe home was suitable for people's needs, but inspectors said redecoration and further changes to make it more dementia friendly were still required.
“Although the home was suitable for the needs of the people living there, redecoration was still required and further enhancements to make the home more dementia friendly.” from the report
- 01How are topical medicines recorded now, and how do you check that every application is recorded correctly?
- 02Who is trained to carry out PEG procedures, and how do you ensure that only the person providing the care completes the record?
- 03What changes have been made in response to the continued Regulation 17 breach, and what evidence shows that they are working?
- 04How are staff interactions monitored in the area where inspectors found care was not consistently kind and respectful?
- 05How are you addressing staff changes, redecoration and improvements to make the home more dementia friendly?
This was an unannounced inspection that assessed all five key questions and included infection prevention and control checks; the report compares the findings with the previous inspection published in December 2022. This explanation was written from the published report of 19 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Primrose House
5 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.
- December 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- December 2022Requires improvementSafe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- March 2022Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- October 2019Goodup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: OutstandingWell-led: Good
- September 2018Requires improvementdown from GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- April 2016GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- November 2015
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 4 November 2015.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.