CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by NYMS Services
Pennine Care Centre
Hobroyd, Glossop, SK13 6JW
Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.
What inspectors found, September 2023
Rated Good; inspectors found improvements in safety and management, but some recording and care plan work still needed.
This was an unannounced focused inspection on 22 and 29 August 2023. Inspectors looked at Safe and Well-led because concerns had been raised about care quality, accidents and incidents, and leadership. They spoke with people, relatives, staff and a professional, and reviewed care, medicine and management records.
The home was rated Good for Safe and Good for Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe recruitment, better cleanliness, safe infection control and suitable support for people's health needs. People were protected from abuse, and managers reviewed accidents, incidents and risks.
There were still areas being improved. Staff did not always record accidents and incidents consistently. Some medicine records did not explain why medicines were not taken, and some care plans lacked detailed, person-specific guidance. The provider was working on these issues.
The overall rating changed from Requires Improvement at the previous inspection, published in September 2022. The previous breaches of regulations had been addressed, so the provider was no longer in breach at this inspection.
Clean and well maintained
Inspectors found that the home had improved its cleanliness and maintenance. Staff carried out regular cleaning and infection control arrangements were in place.
“Domestic staff were completing regular cleaning tasks around the home.” from the report
Enough staff
Staffing levels matched the home's assessment of people's needs. Inspectors saw staff responding quickly and providing one-to-one support where needed.
“There were enough staff. The registered manager completed regular assessments of people's dependency needs which was then used to calculate the number of care hours required.” from the report
Better management oversight
Managers used audits, daily checks and action plans to identify and address problems. Inspectors found that governance systems were now embedded.
“At this inspection we found the provider had governance systems in place which provided effective oversight of key risk areas within the service, and these were now fully embedded.” from the report
Improvement since the last inspection
The provider had made changes after the previous inspection, including changes to the management structure and improvement plans. Relatives reported noticeable improvements.
“It has seriously improved, big improvements, I have no issues.” from the report
People encouraged to give feedback
The home encouraged feedback from people and relatives. It had created a residents' forum and involved relatives through meetings and surveys.
“A resident's forum had been created and a person using the service assigned as the chair.” from the report
Accident records were inconsistent
needs fixingStaff used different systems to record accidents and incidents. Managers were working to improve this through reminders, meetings and training, but inspectors made a recommendation.
“Different processes were used by staff to record accidents and incidents, which meant concerns about safety were not consistently recorded.” from the report
Medicine records needed more detail
needs fixingIn one unit, staff sometimes recorded only 'other' when people did not take medicines. The reason was not always explained, although extra training and competency checks were being arranged.
“Staff did not always provide further information on why the person did not take their medicine.” from the report
Some care plans lacked personal detail
needs fixingSome care plans did not give staff enough specific guidance about how to support a person when distressed. The provider had an action plan to improve this.
“Some people's care plans needed further information to ensure they were fully supported safely.” from the report
Staff culture and engagement
minorSome staff did not always promote the home's stated positive and inclusive culture. Staff feedback was mixed, and the provider was working to improve support and communication.
“Some staff did not always promote this in their practice; however, the provider had identified this and was working to improve the culture within the service.” from the report
- 01How are you making sure every accident and incident is recorded using the correct process?
- 02What changes have been made to medicine records in the Moorland unit, and how are staff competency checks monitored?
- 03Have all care plans been updated with detailed, person-specific guidance, especially for people who may become distressed?
- 04What action are you taking to improve staff culture and make sure staff feel able to raise concerns with managers?
- 05Which ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection rather than assessed during this visit?
This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other key question ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 22 September 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Pennine Care Centre
8 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.
- September 2023Goodcurrent ratingup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- September 2022Requires improvementup from InadequateSafe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- May 2022Inadequatedown from GoodSafe: InadequateCaring: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate
- August 2021GoodSafe: GoodCaring: GoodWell-led: Good
- December 2020Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- November 2019Goodup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- November 2018Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- May 2017Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- October 2015Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- April 2020
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 30 April 2020.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.