Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by DFB (Care)

Palm Court Nursing Home

17 Prideaux Road, Eastbourne, BN21 2ND

Requires improvementpublished 20 January 2026, 7 months ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2023

Palm Court Nursing Home is rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found safer staffing and a cleaner home, but ongoing problems with care records, person-centred care and oversight.

This was an unannounced follow-up inspection on 10 and 12 July 2023. Inspectors observed care, spoke with people, relatives and staff, and reviewed care records, medicine records, recruitment files and quality checks.

The home had enough staff, and improvements had been made to cleanliness, infection control, the building and new admissions. Staff generally knew people well, understood safeguarding procedures and supported people to make choices.

However, records were often incomplete or conflicting. Accidents and incidents were not always reported or investigated properly. Activities were limited, some staff did not respond well when people were upset, and relatives had not been involved in care planning. The service remained in breach of Regulations 9, 12 and 17.

The overall rating stayed at Requires Improvement. Safe, Responsive and Well-led were also rated Requires Improvement. Effective and Caring were not reviewed during this visit, so their earlier ratings carried over.

What inspectors praised
  • Enough staff

    Inspectors found enough staff to support people safely, with good staff presence and no delays in answering call bells.

    There were enough staff to support people safely. People did not have to wait for call bells to be answeredfrom the report
  • Cleaner environment

    The home was cleaner and more hygienic than at the previous inspection. Staff used protective equipment appropriately and recorded cleaning.

    The home was clean and hygienic, and staff recorded areas they had cleaned.from the report
  • Health risks understood

    Information about supporting people with epilepsy and seizures was clear and specific. Staff knew what to do in an emergency.

    Health risks to people were well managed. For example, where people lived with epilepsy and were prone to seizures, information on how staff should support the person in the event of a seizure was clear and detailed.from the report
  • Kind interactions

    Although the response to distress was inconsistent, inspectors also saw staff being kind and respectful, including during mealtimes.

    When staff spoke to people, they were kind and respectful.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Inaccurate care records

    serious

    Daily records did not reliably show the care people received or what happened during the day. Care plans also contained conflicting information about risks and moving people safely.

    People's daily records did not accurately reflect the care and support they were receiving or events that happened throughout the day.from the report
  • Incidents not always reported

    serious

    An incident involving three people was found in a handover sheet but had not initially been reported to management, investigated or referred to safeguarding.

    Accidents and incidents had not always been responded to appropriately by staff.from the report
  • Limited activities

    needs fixing

    People spent long periods without interaction or engagement. Relatives said there were not enough activities for their family members.

    People spent long periods of time without interaction or engagement from staff.from the report
  • Inconsistent response to distress

    needs fixing

    Some staff did not respond appropriately when people were upset. Care plans did not explain clearly what reassurance or support worked for each person.

    Some staff ignored people and didn't interact with them, other staff repeatedly told a person to sit down when they tried to stand up.from the report
  • Weak oversight

    serious

    Audits had not identified repeated problems with medicine records, care plans and daily recording. Several safeguarding concerns were also reported to the regulator late.

    Governance processes were not always effective in identifying concerns.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How will you make sure care plans and risk assessments give staff one clear and up-to-date set of instructions?
  2. 02How are accidents, incidents and safeguarding concerns now reported, investigated and notified to CQC?
  3. 03What activities are now available for people who are often left without interaction?
  4. 04How will staff be taught and checked on the best way to support each person when they are anxious or distressed?
  5. 05When will relatives be invited to care reviews and relative meetings?

This was a follow-up focused inspection of Safe, Responsive and Well-led; Effective and Caring were not inspected and their previous ratings carried over. This explanation was written from the published report of 12 August 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Palm Court Nursing Home

11 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has held its Requires improvement rating throughout.

  1. August 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Palm Court Nursing Home

  2. February 2023Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. December 2021Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. April 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. September 2020Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. June 2019Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. June 2019Inadequatedown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. January 2018Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. September 2017Inadequatestayed Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. November 2016Inadequatedown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. August 2015Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. July 2015Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  13. September 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  14. July 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  15. December 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  16. November 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  17. July 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  18. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 27 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Eastbourne

Prideaux House

Eastbourne, BN21 · 0.0 km
Requires improvement
ResidentialDementia
Rated 5 months agocare home

Ranworth House

Eastbourne, BN21 · 0.2 km
Outstanding
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home

Lebrun House

Eastbourne, BN21 · 0.2 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 4 years agocare home

St Marguerite

Eastbourne, BN21 · 0.3 km
Good
Residential
Rated 3 years agocare home

Arundel Road

Eastbourne, BN21 · 0.3 km
Good
Residential
Rated 6 years agocare home