Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Sutton Nursing Homes

Orchard House Nursing Home

35 Hallmead Road, Sutton, SM1 1RD

Goodpublished 29 November 2023, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. Medicines, infection control, recruitment and responses to incidents were managed safely.
Effective?
Good
This question was not inspected during this focused visit. The previous rating was carried forward to calculate the overall rating.
Caring?
Good
This question was not inspected during this focused visit. The previous rating was carried forward to calculate the overall rating.
Responsive?
Good
This question was not inspected during this focused visit. The previous rating was carried forward to calculate the overall rating.
Well-led?
Requires improvement
Some management and quality systems were not used to their full potential. Records contained old information, incidents were not analysed for patterns, and staffing needs were not formally assessed using a dependency tool.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2023

Rated Good overall; inspectors found safe care, but the home was Requires Improvement for well-led.

This was an unannounced, focused inspection on 7 November 2023. Inspectors spoke with people, relatives and staff, and checked care records, staff records, medicines and how the home was managed.

The home was rated Good for Safe. Inspectors found people were protected from avoidable harm, medicines were managed safely, infection control was effective and there were enough suitable staff. A window safety issue was corrected after the inspection.

The home was rated Requires Improvement for Well-led. Records and quality checks were not always used effectively. Incidents were recorded but not analysed for patterns, some care information was old or difficult to find, and staffing needs were not formally assessed using a dependency tool. The overall rating stayed Good because the other areas were not inspected and their previous ratings were carried forward.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe care

    People and relatives told inspectors they felt safe. Staff knew how to recognise and report abuse, and risks such as falls and pressure wounds were assessed and managed.

    People were safeguarded from abuse and avoidable harm.from the report
  • Medicines

    Medicines were administered, recorded and stored safely. A new electronic medicines system helped staff identify when time-critical medicines were due.

    People were supported to receive their medicines safely.from the report
  • Clean environment

    Inspectors found effective infection prevention and control arrangements and a clean, hygienic home.

    One person told us, the home was "scrupulously clean.from the report
  • Open communication

    People, relatives and staff said they could speak openly with the manager and felt listened to. Relatives said they were kept updated about changes in people's health.

    There was a positive and open culture at the service.from the report
  • Learning and training

    The home had a development plan and regular staff training. Staff were supported to refresh their skills and ask for further training.

    Staff were encouraged to learn and improve their skills.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Incidents not analysed

    needs fixing

    The home recorded incidents but did not analyse them to identify patterns that might help prevent problems or improve care.

    Data was collected about incidents, but this was not analysed to identify any potential patterns which may support prevention or further improvement.from the report
  • Care records were hard to use

    needs fixing

    Some records contained old information and current information was difficult to find. One person's repositioning chart was not completed correctly.

    People's care records contained a lot of old information and the way information was presented made it difficult to locate up to date current information.from the report
  • Staffing review system

    needs fixing

    Managers reviewed people's individual needs, but did not bring this information together in a formal tool to check that staffing levels responded to changing needs.

    This information was not collated in a formal dependency tool to ensure staffing levels were appropriate and responsive to changes in people's needs.from the report
  • Window restrictors

    minor

    The window restrictors did not follow best practice guidance during the visit. Suitable restrictors were fitted after the inspection.

    Following our site visit the operations manager arranged for appropriate restrictors to be fittedfrom the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are you now analysing incidents and accidents for patterns and preventative action?
  2. 02How will the new electronic recording system make current care information easier for staff to find?
  3. 03How do you now check that repositioning charts and other daily records are completed correctly?
  4. 04What formal tool are you using to match staffing levels to changes in people's dependency needs?
  5. 05Have all the window restrictors now been fitted, and how do you check they remain safe?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other key question ratings were carried forward from the last inspection in 2018. This explanation was written from the published report of 29 November 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Orchard House Nursing Home

6 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. November 2023Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Orchard House Nursing Home

  2. October 2020Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. April 2018Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. August 2017Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. April 2017Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. July 2016Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Well-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. February 2016Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. July 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. February 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. December 2012

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 5 December 2012.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Sutton

3 The Green

Sutton, SM1 · 0.2 km
Good
Residential
Rated 4 years agocare home

Lona Lodge

Sutton, SM3 · 1.2 km
Good
Residential
Rated 3 years agocare home

Allswell Lodge

Sutton, SM1 · 1.2 km
Good
Residential
Rated 12 months agocare home