CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Sutton Nursing Homes
Orchard House Nursing Home
35 Hallmead Road, Sutton, SM1 1RD
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- Inspectors found people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. Medicines, infection control, recruitment and responses to incidents were managed safely.
- Effective?
- Good
- This question was not inspected during this focused visit. The previous rating was carried forward to calculate the overall rating.
- Caring?
- Good
- This question was not inspected during this focused visit. The previous rating was carried forward to calculate the overall rating.
- Responsive?
- Good
- This question was not inspected during this focused visit. The previous rating was carried forward to calculate the overall rating.
- Well-led?
- Requires improvement
- Some management and quality systems were not used to their full potential. Records contained old information, incidents were not analysed for patterns, and staffing needs were not formally assessed using a dependency tool.
What inspectors found, November 2023
Rated Good overall; inspectors found safe care, but the home was Requires Improvement for well-led.
This was an unannounced, focused inspection on 7 November 2023. Inspectors spoke with people, relatives and staff, and checked care records, staff records, medicines and how the home was managed.
The home was rated Good for Safe. Inspectors found people were protected from avoidable harm, medicines were managed safely, infection control was effective and there were enough suitable staff. A window safety issue was corrected after the inspection.
The home was rated Requires Improvement for Well-led. Records and quality checks were not always used effectively. Incidents were recorded but not analysed for patterns, some care information was old or difficult to find, and staffing needs were not formally assessed using a dependency tool. The overall rating stayed Good because the other areas were not inspected and their previous ratings were carried forward.
Safe care
People and relatives told inspectors they felt safe. Staff knew how to recognise and report abuse, and risks such as falls and pressure wounds were assessed and managed.
“People were safeguarded from abuse and avoidable harm.” from the report
Medicines
Medicines were administered, recorded and stored safely. A new electronic medicines system helped staff identify when time-critical medicines were due.
“People were supported to receive their medicines safely.” from the report
Clean environment
Inspectors found effective infection prevention and control arrangements and a clean, hygienic home.
“One person told us, the home was "scrupulously clean.” from the report
Open communication
People, relatives and staff said they could speak openly with the manager and felt listened to. Relatives said they were kept updated about changes in people's health.
“There was a positive and open culture at the service.” from the report
Learning and training
The home had a development plan and regular staff training. Staff were supported to refresh their skills and ask for further training.
“Staff were encouraged to learn and improve their skills.” from the report
Incidents not analysed
needs fixingThe home recorded incidents but did not analyse them to identify patterns that might help prevent problems or improve care.
“Data was collected about incidents, but this was not analysed to identify any potential patterns which may support prevention or further improvement.” from the report
Care records were hard to use
needs fixingSome records contained old information and current information was difficult to find. One person's repositioning chart was not completed correctly.
“People's care records contained a lot of old information and the way information was presented made it difficult to locate up to date current information.” from the report
Staffing review system
needs fixingManagers reviewed people's individual needs, but did not bring this information together in a formal tool to check that staffing levels responded to changing needs.
“This information was not collated in a formal dependency tool to ensure staffing levels were appropriate and responsive to changes in people's needs.” from the report
Window restrictors
minorThe window restrictors did not follow best practice guidance during the visit. Suitable restrictors were fitted after the inspection.
“Following our site visit the operations manager arranged for appropriate restrictors to be fitted” from the report
- 01How are you now analysing incidents and accidents for patterns and preventative action?
- 02How will the new electronic recording system make current care information easier for staff to find?
- 03How do you now check that repositioning charts and other daily records are completed correctly?
- 04What formal tool are you using to match staffing levels to changes in people's dependency needs?
- 05Have all the window restrictors now been fitted, and how do you check they remain safe?
This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other key question ratings were carried forward from the last inspection in 2018. This explanation was written from the published report of 29 November 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Orchard House Nursing Home
6 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.
- November 2023Goodcurrent ratingSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- October 2020Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- April 2018Goodup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodWell-led: Good
- August 2017Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- April 2017Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- July 2016Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- February 2016Requires improvementSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- July 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- February 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- December 2012
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 5 December 2012.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.