CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Regency Healthcare
New Victoria Nursing Home
137-139 Hornby Road, Blackpool, FY1 4JG
Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.
What inspectors found, February 2024
Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found kind care, but serious weaknesses in risk management, records, consent and management systems.
This was an unannounced inspection on 17 and 28 November 2023. Inspectors spoke with people, a visitor, a relative and staff. They observed care, checked medicines, reviewed care and recruitment records, and looked around the home.
The home was not always safe or well managed. Risk assessments, care plans and other records were incomplete or inaccurate. Medicines records were still not consistently complete, and recruitment checks had gaps. Inspectors also found problems with consent and covert medicines, including one case where a person had capacity but had been subject to restrictions.
People were treated with kindness and respect. They said they felt safe, and inspectors found enough staff during the visit. However, the home was rated Requires Improvement overall and in Safe, Effective, Responsive and Well-led. Caring was rated Good. The home has had this overall rating for three consecutive inspections.
Kind and respectful care
People were treated with kindness, dignity and respect. Staff knew people's preferences and encouraged them to remain independent.
“People were treated with respect, compassion, and kindness, they were given emotional support when needed.” from the report
Enough staff during the visit
Inspectors saw staff respond to requests for help, and people said staff came quickly when they used their call buzzer.
“Staff were deployed effectively, during the inspection we observed staff responding to calls for assistance.” from the report
Activities and relationships
People were supported to maintain relationships and join in activities such as games, coffee trips and dominoes.
“There was an activities coordinator at the service and people told us they were supported to take part in activities.” from the report
Positive staff culture
Staff said they were happy in their roles and felt supported. People, relatives and staff were positive about the registered manager.
“There was a positive staff culture at the service and staff were happy in their roles.” from the report
Risk records were incomplete
seriousRisks to people's health, safety and wellbeing were not consistently assessed or managed. Incorrect emergency evacuation information was found in four records.
“People were at increased risk of harm as systems for monitoring and learning from accidents and incidents were not robust.” from the report
Medicines records still had gaps
seriousRecords did not always explain why medicines were not needed or give staff all the information required. This followed an earlier recommendation about medicines recording.
“At this inspection we found not enough improvement had been made.” from the report
Consent and restrictions
seriousThe home did not always follow the Mental Capacity Act. Covert medicines were started without the required decision, and the person involved had capacity and should not have been restricted.
“A person had been receiving covert medicines. The covert procedure had been implemented without a DoLS or best interests' decision prior to this being commenced.” from the report
Eating and drinking information
seriousRecords did not always show people's dietary needs or the correct consistency for drinks. This could have increased the risk of harm.
“We were not assured people received drinks prepared to the correct texture in line with professional guidelines.” from the report
Weak management checks
seriousAudits did not always identify or resolve the problems found by inspectors. Records were not reliably accurate, complete and up to date.
“The governance system was ineffective. Areas of concern on inspection had not been noted and fully addressed.” from the report
- 01What has been done to make sure every person's risk assessment and care plan is accurate, current and detailed enough for staff to follow?
- 02How are medicines records, including topical treatments and missed or refused medicines, now checked?
- 03How do you make sure capacity assessments, best-interests decisions and DoLS authorisations are completed before restrictions or covert medicines are used?
- 04What changes have been made to record the correct food and drink textures and each person's eating and drinking needs?
- 05What action plan followed the warning notices, and how will you show that improvements have been sustained?
This was an unannounced inspection covering all five key questions, the premises and the care provided; the detailed Responsive section says Good while the report's ratings table says Requires Improvement. This explanation was written from the published report of 29 February 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of New Victoria Nursing Home
6 rated inspections over 9 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.
- February 2024Requires improvementcurrent ratingstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- August 2021Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- April 2021Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- December 2020Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- November 2019Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- May 2017Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- May 2015GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- October 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- March 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- June 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- October 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 19 January 2011.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Regency Healthcare Limited
4 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.