CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Nugent Care
Margaret Roper House
447 Liverpool Road, Birkdale, Southport, PR8 3BW
Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.
- Safe?
- Requires improvement
- Risks were not always assessed or managed accurately. Medicines records and staff competency checks were incomplete, and the premises had fire safety, equipment, cleanliness and repair concerns.
- Effective?
- Requires improvement
- Consent records did not always follow the Mental Capacity Act. Care plans did not always give enough guidance about diets or show that professional advice had been followed, and some staff refresher training was overdue.
- Caring?
- Good
- Caring was not inspected during this focused inspection, so no new rating was given. People said staff treated and supported them well.
- Responsive?
- Good
- Responsive was not inspected during this focused inspection, so no new rating was given.
- Well-led?
- Requires improvement
- Quality checks and action plans were not reliable enough, and records were not always accurate. The home had no registered manager in post and had been without one for over 12 months.
What inspectors found, January 2024
Requires Improvement; inspectors found risks with care records, medicines, premises and management systems.
This was an unannounced focused inspection on 13 November 2023. Inspectors looked only at Safe, Effective and Well-led. They spoke with five people, staff and managers, and checked care records, medicines, staff files and quality records.
The home was not always safe or effective. Risk assessments and care plans were incomplete or inconsistent. Medicines checks and records were not always reliable. Some fire safety checks, equipment checks and cleaning arrangements were not adequate. Staff training and consent records also needed improvement.
Management oversight was not strong enough. The home had been without a registered manager for more than 12 months, and audits had not always led to action. The overall rating changed from Good at the previous inspection in 2017 to Requires Improvement. The provider had started work on some problems, but CQC will monitor progress.
Kind staff
People gave positive feedback about how staff treated and supported them. People appeared calm and at ease in the home.
“People told us they were treated and supported well and enjoyed living at the home.” from the report
People felt safe
People said they felt safe and knew they could speak to staff if they were unhappy.
“People told us they felt safe living at the service.” from the report
Safe recruitment
The recruitment records checked by inspectors included the required pre-employment checks.
“Recruitment of new staff was safe. Pre-employment checks were completed to help ensure staff members were safe to work with vulnerable people.” from the report
Action had started
The provider responded positively to the inspection and had begun work on some problems, including fire door repairs and changes to pharmacy support.
“Both the provider and quality compliance team responded in a positive and proactive way to the findings at our inspection” from the report
Risk records were unreliable
seriousCare plans and risk assessments did not always explain how risks should be reduced. Some risk ratings were inconsistent or had not been reviewed.
“Risks were not always managed safely. Care plans and risk assessments did not always evidence people received planned care that met their needs.” from the report
Medicines safety
seriousRecords did not always show the care people needed or received for medicines. Some staff were not up to date with training or competency checks, and medicines policies lacked enough guidance.
“The provider failed to ensure medicines were managed safely, this was a breach of regulation 12 (Safe Care and Treatment) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.” from the report
Premises and cleanliness
seriousSome internal doors were not fire safety compliant. Inspectors also found dirty communal toilets, damaged bathrooms and incomplete cleaning or safety checks.
“The provider failed to ensure the premises were safe to use by people, this was a breach of regulation 12” from the report
Consent was not always recorded
seriousRecords did not always show that people had agreed to their care plans. Mental capacity assessments were not always completed when there were concerns about a person's ability to consent.
“Failure to assess mental capacity and ensure consent was sought in line with the principles of the MCA, is a breach of Regulation 11” from the report
Weak management oversight
seriousAudits did not always identify problems or lead to timely action. The home had no registered manager and had been without one for over 12 months.
“The provider failed to operate effective systems to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service” from the report
Training and diet records
needs fixingSome refresher training was overdue. Care plans and daily records did not always give or record the support people needed with specific diets and fluids.
“We recommend the provider ensures systems in place to train and support staff are more effective and refresher training is provided in line with best practice guidance.” from the report
- 01What has been done to make the internal doors fire safety compliant, and has this work been checked?
- 02How are medicines now checked, and are all staff who administer them up to date with training and competency assessments?
- 03How will you make sure every person's risk assessment and care plan is accurate, current and clear for staff to follow?
- 04How do you record people's consent and complete mental capacity assessments when needed?
- 05When will a registered manager be in post, and how will the provider check that the action plan is working?
This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led only; Caring and Responsive were not inspected, and the overall rating used the previous ratings for the questions not inspected. This explanation was written from the published report of 11 January 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Margaret Roper House
6 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.
- January 2024Requires improvementcurrent ratingSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- February 2021Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- December 2017Goodup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Good
- April 2017Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- December 2016Requires improvementdown from GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- September 2016Goodstayed GoodSafe: Requires improvement
- January 2016GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- April 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- December 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- November 2011
Report published without a new overall rating.
- August 2011
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 18 January 2011.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Nugent Care
2 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.