CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Glenfield Care
Lyncroft Care Home
88 Alfreton Road, South Normanton, Alfreton, DE55 2AS
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- Inspectors found people were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. There were enough suitable staff, medicines were managed safely, risks were reviewed and the home followed infection control practices.
- Effective?
- Good
- No separate rating was given for Effective in this inspection. The report says staff had training in the Mental Capacity Act and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards, and people were supported to make decisions.
- Caring?
- Good
- No separate rating was given for Caring in this inspection. The report describes positive feedback from people and relatives and says care was person-centred.
- Responsive?
- Good
- No separate rating was given for Responsive in this inspection. The report says people were supported to take part in community charity events and relatives could visit without restrictions.
- Well-led?
- Good
- Inspectors found a positive, open culture, clear management responsibilities and regular audits. People, relatives and staff had opportunities to give feedback and influence the service.
What inspectors found, December 2023
Lyncroft Care Home is rated Good; inspectors found people were safe and the home was well-led, with both assessed ratings unchanged since 2018.
The inspection was unannounced and took place on 16 November 2023. One inspector and an expert by experience visited the home. They spoke with all 8 people living there, 6 relatives and 3 staff, and checked care, medicines, recruitment and management records.
The home was rated Good overall. Safe and Well-led were both rated Good, and both ratings had stayed the same since the previous inspection. Inspectors found enough trained staff, safe medicines practice, suitable risk assessments and a clean home.
Inspectors also found an open and positive culture. People and relatives were able to give feedback, relatives could visit without restriction, and the provider used audits, incident reviews and action plans to monitor the service.
People were kept safe
Inspectors found that risks were assessed and managed. Staff knew how to respond to safeguarding concerns.
“People were safeguarded from abuse and avoidable harm. Risks were assessed and mitigated to ensure people were safe.” from the report
Enough trained staff
The home had enough suitable staff to meet people's needs. Recruitment checks included references and Disclosure and Barring Service checks.
“The provider ensured there were sufficient numbers of suitable staff.” from the report
Safe medicines practice
Staff handling medicines had training and regular competence checks. People's medicine needs and guidance for medicines taken as needed were recorded.
“Staff who handled medicines had completed training and their competence in handling medicines safely had been regularly assessed.” from the report
Open management
Inspectors found a positive and open culture. Managers used audits, staff checks and action plans to monitor care.
“There was a positive and open culture at the service.” from the report
Community involvement
People took part in charity events, with funds used towards holidays and days out. The home also worked with local health professionals.
“People were supported to take part in community charity events.” from the report
Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.
- 01How will you assess and regularly review my relative's individual risks and care needs?
- 02How do you check that staff remain competent to give medicines, including medicines prescribed to be taken as needed?
- 03What activities and community events could my relative take part in, and how would their preferences be recorded?
- 04How would you tell me about an accident, incident or safeguarding concern involving my relative?
- 05How are feedback from people and relatives, staff ideas and audit findings turned into action?
This inspection reviewed Safe and Well-led; the report does not give separate ratings for Effective, Caring or Responsive. This explanation was written from the published report of 28 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Lyncroft Care Home
3 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.
- December 2023Goodcurrent ratingstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- March 2018Goodup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodWell-led: Good
- January 2017Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- October 2014
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 28 October 2014.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.