CQC report explained · a residential care home
Knowle Court
38 Knowl Road, Golcar, Huddersfield, HD7 4AN
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- Risks were assessed and reviewed, medicines were managed safely, and infection prevention systems were in place. Inspectors found enough staff and safe recruitment checks.
- Effective?
- Good
- People's needs, nutrition and healthcare were managed effectively. The home had improved its recording of decision-specific capacity assessments and best-interest decisions since the previous inspection.
- Caring?
- Good
- This question was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was used when calculating the overall rating.
- Responsive?
- Good
- This question was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was used when calculating the overall rating.
- Well-led?
- Good
- Inspectors found a positive and open culture, clear management responsibilities, strong auditing and good involvement of people, relatives and staff.
What inspectors found, January 2024
Rated Good; inspectors found safe, effective and well-managed care, although staff were described as busy.
This was an unannounced focused inspection on 20 December 2023. Inspectors reviewed records, staff training and recruitment, and how the home was managed. They spoke with 7 people, 1 relative and 8 staff.
The home was rated Good for Safe, Effective and Well-led. Inspectors found that risks and medicines were managed safely, there were enough staff, infection control was good, and staff had suitable training and support.
People enjoyed the food, had choice, and were involved in their care. The home worked with health and social care professionals, and its audits and complaint systems were being used well.
The overall rating remained Good. The Effective rating improved from Requires Improvement at the previous inspection. Caring and Responsive were not inspected at this visit, so their previous ratings were carried forward.
Safety systems
The home assessed and reviewed risks, managed medicines safely and had systems to reduce infection risks.
“People were safe because systems were in place to make sure risks to people were assessed and actions taken to mitigate the risk.” from the report
Food and nutrition
People had plenty of choice, and staff monitored food and fluid intake. The cook understood individual dietary needs.
“People's diet and fluid intake was monitored and recorded.” from the report
Involvement and communication
People and staff were able to give their views through meetings, questionnaires and other feedback. The home shared responses through newsletters and 'You said, we did' information.
“People felt involved and were able to give their views about the service through satisfaction questionnaires and regular meetings.” from the report
Management and improvement
The management team used audits to identify issues and develop action plans. Complaints were dealt with promptly.
“A very robust system of auditing identified any potential issues within the service and action plans were developed to make sure they were addressed.” from the report
Staff could be busy
minorPeople and staff said there were enough staff, but people also said staff were quite busy. Ask how call bells and other requests are prioritised at busy times.
“People we spoke with confirmed this but said staff were very busy.” from the report
- 01How do you make sure staff are available promptly when the home is busy?
- 02What are the current ratings for Caring and Responsive, which were not inspected during this visit?
- 03How do you keep decision-specific capacity assessments and best-interest decisions up to date?
- 04How are people's food, drink and weight monitored if staff identify a concern?
- 05How do people and relatives see what the home has done in response to their feedback or complaints?
This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led only; Caring and Responsive were not inspected and their previous ratings were carried forward. This explanation was written from the published report of 12 January 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Knowle Court
3 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.
- January 2024Goodcurrent ratingstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- December 2017Goodup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Good
- October 2016Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- November 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- November 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- October 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- December 2010
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 15 December 2010.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.