CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Parkhaven Trust
James Page
Parkhaven Trust, Deyes Lane, Maghull, L31 6DJ
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. Inspectors found safe staffing, secure medicine storage and detailed risk assessments, but some medicine, equipment and incident records were not always complete.
- Effective?
- Good
- This area was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was used when calculating the overall rating.
- Caring?
- Good
- This area was not inspected during this visit. The report says people had positive relationships with staff and were treated in a caring and respectful way.
- Responsive?
- Good
- This area was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was used when calculating the overall rating.
- Well-led?
- Good
- The home had a positive culture, approachable management and regular checks on quality. Managers responded to issues raised during the inspection and improved some monitoring systems.
What inspectors found, January 2024
James Page is rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind care, with some records needing improvement.
This was an unannounced focused inspection on 28 and 30 November 2023. Two inspectors spoke with people using the home, relatives, staff and a healthcare professional. They also checked care records, medicine records, staff files and management records.
The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. People told inspectors they felt safe and were happy living there. Staff knew people well, staffing levels were safe, and people had personalised care plans and risk assessments.
Inspectors found some minor problems with medicine records, air mattress checks and accident records. The management team acted straight away and improved some systems during the inspection. The overall rating stayed Good because the other three areas were not inspected and their previous ratings were carried forward.
Personalised risk management
Care plans and risk assessments were detailed and regularly reviewed. They gave staff the information needed to manage people's risks.
“People had detailed, personalised risk assessments which were regularly reviewed and gave staff enough detail to manage risk associated with people's care.” from the report
Kind and respectful care
Inspectors saw staff offering choices and speaking respectfully. People and relatives gave positive feedback about the care.
“People were offered choice and spoken to in a caring and respectful manner.” from the report
Safe staffing
Recruitment checks had been completed and staffing levels were considered safe. Regular agency workers were used to provide consistency.
“Staffing levels were safe. Agency staff were sometimes used, however regular individuals were employed from the agency to ensure consistency.” from the report
Responsive management
The manager was available during the inspection and acted promptly when inspectors raised concerns. Quality checks were changed and developed in response.
“The registered manager was on hand throughout the inspection and was responsive to issues we raised.” from the report
Medicine records
needs fixingNurses did not always record where transdermal patches were applied. The home also needed clearer guidance for some medicines given only when needed.
“People received their medicines as prescribed, however, nurses did not always record the exact application site of transdermal patches.” from the report
Guidance for medicines when needed
needs fixingGuidance was missing for one newly admitted person and did not include all the steps staff should try before offering some medicines.
“Appropriate guidance had not been developed for 1 newly admitted person who had medicines prescribed on an 'as required basis'.” from the report
Air mattress checks
needs fixingSome air flow mattresses were not correctly calibrated to people's weights. The home addressed the shortfall and reviewed its monitoring system.
“However, not all were accurately calibrated to the individual's weight.” from the report
Incident records
needs fixingSome accident and incident records were inconsistent and lacked clarity. The manager took action after inspectors raised this.
“We identified some recording inconsistencies which meant some records lacked clarity.” from the report
- 01How do you now record the exact application site of transdermal patches?
- 02What written guidance is now in place for medicines given on an as-required basis?
- 03How do you check that each air flow mattress is correctly calibrated to the person's weight?
- 04What changes have been made to make accident and incident records clear and consistent?
- 05What were the ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive at the previous comprehensive inspection?
This was an unannounced focused inspection of Safe and Well-led; the ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive were carried forward from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 11 January 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of James Page
4 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.
- January 2024Goodcurrent ratingstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- December 2018Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodWell-led: Good
- August 2017Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodWell-led: Good
- June 2016GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- May 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- February 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- October 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 26 January 2011.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Parkhaven Trust
1 other service on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.