Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Lotus Care (Finch Manor)

Finch Manor Nursing Home

Finch Lea Drive, Liverpool, L14 9QN

Inadequatepublished 27 March 2026, 5 months ago

Rated Inadequate: inspectors found the service performing badly and the CQC has taken enforcement action.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2024

Finch Manor Nursing Home was rated Inadequate and remains in special measures; inspectors found serious, repeated failures that put people at risk of avoidable harm.

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection over three days. Inspectors spoke with people living in the home, relatives and staff. They reviewed care records, medicines records, staff files and records about the running of the home.

Inspectors found serious problems with care, medicines, staffing and risk management. People's needs were not reliably assessed or met. Accidents and care failures were repeated. Some people waited a long time for help, and clinical care was poorly delivered.

The home was rated Inadequate in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. The overall rating was unchanged from the previous inspection. The report says the home remains in special measures because significant improvements are needed.

What inspectors praised
  • Cleaner environment

    Inspectors found that the home was adequately clean during the visit. Cleaning schedules and protective supplies were in place.

    During our visit the home was adequately clean.from the report
  • Visitors welcomed

    People could have regular visitors, and inspectors saw that visitors were welcomed into the home.

    People were able to have regular visitors and we saw that visitors were welcomed into the home.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Insufficient staffing

    serious

    Inspectors found that staffing levels were not safe or sufficient, particularly at night. The heavy use of agency staff also meant staff did not always know people's needs.

    Not enough staff were on duty to meet people's needs and keep them safe.from the report
  • Poor clinical care

    serious

    Wounds, catheters, continence, nutrition and other health needs were not consistently assessed, treated or monitored. This left people at risk of avoidable harm.

    Wound management was inadequate. People's wounds were not assessed or cared for appropriately to prevent further skin breakdown or infection.from the report
  • Dignity not protected

    serious

    Inspectors saw people left in undignified or uncomfortable situations, including one person left with wet food on their clothing and another left with their door open while undressed.

    Another person sat for 20 minutes with wet food all down their front at lunchtime, before any action was taken by staff to help them change.from the report
  • Limited activities and personalisation

    needs fixing

    People had little meaningful activity and were often left in lounges or bedrooms. Care plans did not consistently reflect people's needs and preferences.

    There was little in the way of any meaningful activities for people to engage with.from the report
  • Weak management oversight

    serious

    Audits identified repeated failings, but managers and the provider did not take robust action to stop them happening again. The manager in post was not registered with CQC at the time of inspection.

    The systems in place to monitor the quality and safety of the service were not effective.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What immediate changes have been made in response to the urgent action plan?
  2. 02How are you now checking that medicines, insulin and time-sensitive medicines are given safely and on time?
  3. 03What staffing levels are provided on each shift, especially at night, and how do you check agency staff understand each person's needs?
  4. 04How are care plans and risk assessments being reviewed for wounds, nutrition, fluids, continence, repositioning and choking risks?
  5. 05How are mental capacity assessments, best-interest decisions and consent being recorded and followed?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions, including the premises and care provided; all five ratings remained Inadequate. This explanation was written from the published report of 4 April 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Finch Manor Nursing Home

7 rated inspections over 5 years: the service has slipped, from Requires improvement to Inadequate.

  1. April 2024Inadequatecurrent ratingstayed Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: InadequateResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate

    Read what inspectors found at Finch Manor Nursing Home

  2. August 2023Inadequatestayed Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: InadequateResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. February 2023Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. March 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. May 2021Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. September 2020Inadequatestayed Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. October 2019Inadequatedown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. April 2019Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. March 2018

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 14 March 2018.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Liverpool

Paisley Court

Liverpool, L14 · 0.4 km
Not yet rated
NursingDementia
Not yet ratedcare home

Paisley Court

Liverpool, L14 · 0.4 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 19 months agocare home

Mayfield Court

Liverpool, L14 · 1.0 km
Outstanding
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home

Moss View

Liverpool, L14 · 1.2 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 16 months agocare home