CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Messrs A & M Desai - Desai Care Homes
Culverhayes Nursing Home
Lymore Avenue, Twerton, Bath, BA2 1AY
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- People were supported safely, with safeguarding procedures, risk assessments, pressure area guidance, enough staff and safe medicines systems. Inspectors identified unlocked refurbishment rooms and chipped paintwork, but action was taken or planned during the inspection.
- Effective?
- Good
- This area was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was carried forward.
- Caring?
- Good
- This area was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was carried forward.
- Responsive?
- Good
- This area was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was carried forward.
- Well-led?
- Good
- Inspectors found a positive and open culture, clear roles, effective audits, appropriate complaint handling and good partnership working. Relatives said they were not always involved in care planning or reviews.
What inspectors found, December 2023
Culverhayes Nursing Home is Rated Good; inspectors found people were supported safely, but noted some smaller safety and involvement issues.
This was an unannounced, focused inspection on 1 November 2023. Inspectors checked whether people were safe and whether the home was well-led. They spoke with people, relatives, staff and the interim manager, observed care, and reviewed care plans, medicines records, recruitment files, complaints and audits.
The inspection followed concerns about personal care, pressure area care, and an allegation of physical abuse and neglect. Inspectors found no evidence that people were at risk of harm from these concerns. They found good safeguarding, enough staff, clear risk guidance and improvements in medicines checks since the previous inspection.
The home was rated Good overall, with Safe rated Good and Well-led rated Good. The other three areas were not inspected during this visit, so their previous ratings were used to calculate the overall rating.
Safeguarding and risk care
Staff understood safeguarding and followed people's care plans and risk management guidance. Inspectors saw people being repositioned regularly and pressure-relieving equipment used appropriately.
“People were supported safely. Staff had a good understanding of safeguarding and acted in people's best interest where necessary.” from the report
Staffing
Inspectors found enough staff to support people safely. Staff recruitment checks were completed, although the approach to repeating DBS checks was not fully risk-assessed.
“There were enough staff to support people safely. One staff told us: "I have never experienced a staff shortage, the manager will arrange cover if it is needed.” from the report
Medicines improvements
The home had improved its medicines auditing since the previous inspection. Inspectors found medicines were stored safely and people received them as prescribed.
“At the last inspection we recommended the provider review their auditing processes around medication, particularly around identifying where medicines were not stored at safe temperatures and stock balances of medication. We found improvements had been made in these areas.” from the report
Leadership and teamwork
Staff described a positive team culture, regular supervision and useful training. Inspectors found clear roles, effective audits and appropriate handling of the one complaint received since the previous inspection.
“There was a positive and open culture within the service. Staff described the service as a "whole team process" which worked well.” from the report
Activities and outside support
People could choose from individual trips, group activities and activities at the home. The home worked with health professionals and made referrals when needed.
“There were different types of activities available such as 1:1 trips out, group activities and 1:1 activities at the service.” from the report
Unsecured refurbishment rooms
seriousTwo rooms contained paint cleaner and power tools and were left unlocked and unattended at points during the inspection. The manager acted after this was raised, but this could have put people living with dementia at risk.
“These rooms were left unattended and unlocked at points throughout our inspection, which could have presented a risk to people living with dementia.” from the report
Chipped paintwork
needs fixingSome paintwork was chipped and needed repair. Inspectors said this could prevent effective cleaning and create an infection control risk. The home said repairs were part of ongoing maintenance work.
“This presents an infection control risk as it prevents these areas from being cleaned effectively.” from the report
DBS checks
minorRecruitment checks had been completed, but DBS checks were not repeated at regular intervals in line with best practice. The home had not shown that it had considered the risk of this approach.
“However, it was not evident the risk of this had been considered.” from the report
Family involvement
minorSome relatives said they were not always involved in care planning or care plan reviews. The home explained its review process and later held a meeting to explain it to relatives.
“Relatives told is they were not always involved in the care planning process or care plan reviews of their relative.” from the report
- 01How will you make sure refurbishment rooms are locked and safe whenever work is taking place?
- 02When will the chipped paintwork be repaired, and how do you manage the infection control risk while this is outstanding?
- 03How do you decide when staff DBS checks should be repeated, and how is that risk recorded?
- 04How will you make sure relatives are invited to care planning meetings and care plan reviews?
- 05Which areas of care were not assessed during this inspection, and when were they last reviewed?
This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive were carried forward from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 23 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Culverhayes Nursing Home
4 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.
- December 2023Goodcurrent ratingstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- June 2023Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodWell-led: Good
- July 2018Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodWell-led: Good
- January 2016GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- February 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- October 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- July 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- May 2011
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 13 January 2011.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.