CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Cliffe Vale Residential Home

Cliffe Vale Residential Home Limited

228 Bradford Road, Shipley, BD18 3AN

Requires improvementpublished 28 January 2020, 6 years ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The five questions inspectors ask

Safe?: Requires improvement; Are people protected from harm? Staffing, medicines, infection control, safeguarding.
Effective?: Requires improvement; Does the care work? Training, consent, food and drink, working with GPs and nurses.
Caring?: Good; Are people treated with kindness and dignity?
Responsive?: Good; Is care built around the person? Care plans, activities, complaints.
Well-led?: Requires improvement; Is the service run well? The manager, the culture, how problems get found and fixed.

The report

We have not explained this report yet

The CQC published its most recent report on Cliffe Vale Residential Home Limited on 9 February 2022. We are still reading it. Check back soon, or read the report itself on cqc.org.uk.

Read the report on cqc.org.uk

The story over the years

Every inspection of Cliffe Vale Residential Home Limited

5 rated inspections over 5 years: the service has held its Requires improvement rating throughout.

February 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
Safe: Inspected but not rated
We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk
December 2020Inspected but not rated
Safe: Inspected but not rated
We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk
January 2020Requires improvementdown from Good
Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
June 2017Goodup from Requires improvement
Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
June 2016Requires improvementup from Inadequate
Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
February 2016Inadequatedown from Requires improvement
Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
March 2015Requires improvement
Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
October 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
June 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
March 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
May 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
Read this report on cqc.org.uk
November 2010
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 22 November 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

About live-in care How PrimeCarers works

Nearby