CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Rose Petals Health Care
Clare Mount
376-378, Rochdale Road, Middleton, Manchester, M24 2QQ
Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.
What inspectors found, February 2024
Requires Improvement; inspectors found improvements in medicines and staffing, but serious safety and management weaknesses remained.
This was an unannounced focused inspection on 11 January 2024. Inspectors looked only at Safe and Well-led, after concerns about staffing, communication, safety and person-centred care. They spoke with people, relatives and staff, and checked care, medicines, recruitment, training, maintenance and management records.
The home had enough staff when inspectors visited. Safeguarding arrangements were in place, medicines were managed well, and staff had suitable training. Relatives spoke positively about staff and said communication had improved.
However, important fire safety, electrical and passenger lift work had not been completed. Infection control checks needed improvement, and some areas needed refurbishment. Management audits had not identified these risks. The home was rated Requires Improvement for Safe and Well-led, and remains Requires Improvement overall.
Medicines
Medicines audits had improved. Records were accurate, administration records were fully signed, and inspectors found no discrepancies in medicines remaining on site.
“Medicine records were reviewed regularly and records were accurate.” from the report
Staffing and safeguarding
There were enough staff on duty during the visit, and staff understood their safeguarding responsibilities. Relatives generally felt people were safe.
“There were sufficient numbers of staff to provide care and support to people promptly.” from the report
Staff support and communication
Relatives said communication had improved and described the staff and management positively. Staff said they had good working relationships and felt supported.
“Relatives were complimentary about the staff and management team and said communication had improved.” from the report
Outstanding safety work
seriousHigh-priority fire safety work had not been completed. Remedial work identified in the electrical installation report and passenger lift report also remained outstanding, creating a risk of harm.
“This placed people at risk of harm. This was a breach of Regulation 12 (safe care and treatment) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.” from the report
Weak management checks
seriousAudits and management oversight had not identified important environmental safety and infection control problems. The provider had not consistently completed recommended actions.
“The provider had failed to ensure systems for governance and management oversight were robust and effective.” from the report
Cleaning and refurbishment
needs fixingSome bathrooms, flooring and skirting boards were not clean. Poor wall and flooring conditions made thorough cleaning difficult, and cleaning schedules were not consistently completed.
“Bathrooms could not be thoroughly cleaned due to the poor condition of some walls and flooring.” from the report
- 01Has the high-priority work to the roof voids and other fire safety recommendations now been completed and checked?
- 02What remedial work was required by the electrical installation report, and has the installation been made satisfactory?
- 03What work was needed after the passenger lift service report, and is the lift now safe to use?
- 04What refurbishment and cleaning changes have been made in the bathrooms, lounge and other areas?
- 05How will managers make sure their audits identify safety and infection control problems promptly?
This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive were carried over from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 13 February 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Clare Mount
5 rated inspections over 4 years: the service has held its Requires improvement rating throughout.
- February 2024Requires improvementcurrent ratingstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- July 2022Requires improvementup from InadequateSafe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- June 2022Inadequatedown from GoodSafe: InadequateEffective: InadequateResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate
- January 2021Goodup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- January 2020Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- December 2018
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 20 December 2018.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.