Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Care First Class ()

Cherry Lodge

6 Manningford Road, Druids Heath, Birmingham, B14 5LD

Requires improvementpublished 21 August 2025, 12 months ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, January 2024

Rated Requires Improvement; the home has improved from Inadequate and left special measures, but care planning and quality checks still need fixing.

Inspectors carried out an unannounced comprehensive inspection on 4 and 5 December 2023. They spoke with people, relatives and staff, observed care, and checked care, medicines, staffing and management records.

The home had improved since its last inspection. People were safer, medicines were generally given correctly, staffing and recruitment had improved, and staff treated people with kindness. Consent arrangements, emergency records and infection control had also improved.

However, some care plans and risk assessments were not detailed or up to date. People did not always receive activities that matched their interests. Care reviews were inconsistent, and the systems used to monitor quality and learn from incidents were not reliable enough.

All five areas were rated Requires Improvement. The home was no longer Inadequate or in special measures, but the provider remains in breach of rules about person-centred care and good governance.

What inspectors praised
  • Improved safety

    People received medicines safely and as prescribed. Manual handling, food preparation and storage of sharps had improved since the previous inspection.

    At this inspection we found people received their medicines safely and as prescribed.from the report
  • Enough permanent staff

    Inspectors saw enough staff on duty, and recruitment checks had been completed. The provider had reduced its reliance on agency workers.

    Our observations during the day indicated there were enough staff on duty to support people with their care needs.from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Inspectors observed kind interactions. Staff described ways of protecting people's dignity during personal care.

    We observed kind and caring interactions between staff and people.from the report
  • Better consent practice

    People could leave and return to the home, CCTV consultations had taken place, and mental capacity and best-interest decisions were recorded when needed.

    At this inspection we found people had access to key codes and could leave and return to the home as they wished.from the report
  • Positive staff support

    Staff said they felt valued and able to raise concerns. They received training, supervision and opportunities to discuss improvements.

    Staff told us they felt valued, and their views were respected.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Care plans and reviews

    serious

    Some people and relatives were not involved in care reviews. Some reviews were late, and agreed actions, including requests for activities, were not recorded as completed.

    Some care plan reviews were not completed within the timescales set out in people's care plans.from the report
  • Weak quality monitoring

    serious

    Management checks did not always identify missing or outdated information. The provider did not consistently show that it was monitoring quality and safety effectively.

    Systems were not robust enough to demonstrate effective monitoring of the quality and safety of the service.from the report
  • Learning from falls

    needs fixing

    Incident records were completed, but the home did not always identify patterns or put preventative measures in place after falls.

    Further work was required to ensure patterns and trends are identified and strategies put in place to reduce the likelihood of reoccurrence.from the report
  • Meaningful activities

    needs fixing

    Some people spent most of the day in one communal area and were not always offered activities linked to their interests and hobbies.

    Some people had not always been supported to access activities of interest or receive care based on their preferences.from the report
  • Outdated medicine instructions

    needs fixing

    Some covert medicine records were out of date and did not clearly explain how the medicine should be added to food or drink.

    Some people's covert medication protocol records were out of date.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How will you make sure every person's care review happens on time and includes the person and their relatives where appropriate?
  2. 02What activities are planned for my relative's interests and hobbies, and how will you check they are offered and taken up?
  3. 03How do you investigate falls and make sure preventative actions, such as checking alarms or increasing observations, are completed?
  4. 04How are outdated care plans and covert medication instructions found and corrected?
  5. 05What actions are included in the monthly improvement reports sent to CQC, and what progress has been made so far?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions and both the care provided and the premises. This explanation was written from the published report of 27 January 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Cherry Lodge

6 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has held its Requires improvement rating throughout.

  1. January 2024Requires improvementcurrent ratingup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Cherry Lodge

  2. February 2023Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: InadequateResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. November 2020Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. April 2019Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. March 2018Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. October 2016Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. December 2015Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. August 2014

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 19 August 2014.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Birmingham

Tandy Court

Birmingham, B14 · 0.3 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 8 months agoReport explained

Maycroft

Birmingham, B14 · 0.4 km
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home

Manningford

Birmingham, B14 · 0.5 km
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home

Joseph House

Birmingham, B14 · 0.5 km
Not yet rated
Residential
Not yet ratedcare home

Maypole Grove

Birmingham, B14 · 1.4 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 4 years agocare home