Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Horizon Senior Living

Castlewellan House

41 Moss Grove, Kingswinford, DY6 9HP

Requires improvementpublished 15 March 2024, 2 years ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Requires improvement
Controlled medicines were not always checked in line with the home's policy. Some as-required medicine guidance and medicine administration records were incomplete, and staff were not always positioned where people could be monitored.
Effective?
Good
People had pre-assessments, training was available for staff and people received food, drinks and healthcare support. However, some care guidance about meal portions was not clear enough.
Caring?
Good
Staff treated people with respect, listened to their wishes and supported their privacy and independence. Inspectors observed kind interactions and one-to-one time.
Responsive?
Good
Care plans were person centred and people were involved in their care. However, people and relatives said they wanted more activities, and planned activities did not always take place.
Well-led?
Requires improvement
The manager and provider were open to feedback and had an improvement plan. However, audits had not identified medicine problems, and there was a gap in understanding about reporting incidents to local authorities.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2024

Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found kind and effective care, but medicines, incident reporting and management checks were not reliable enough.

This was an unannounced inspection. Inspectors visited on 4 January 2024, spoke with 13 people, 12 relatives and 4 staff, observed care and checked care, medicine, training and management records.

The home was rated Good for Effective, Caring and Responsive. People were treated respectfully, received personal care and had choices. Inspectors also found good food, healthcare support and person-centred care plans.

Safe and Well-led were rated Requires Improvement. Medicines were not always checked safely, some incidents were not reported in line with local procedures, and management audits had missed problems. Activities did not always take place, leaving some people disengaged.

The overall rating changed from Good under the previous provider to Requires Improvement. This means some aspects were not always safe and leadership was inconsistent, although the provider had an active plan to make improvements.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful care

    People were described as happy and well presented. Inspectors saw staff listening, seeking consent and respecting privacy, dignity and independence.

    People who lived in the home we observed were happy, well presented and had received support with their personal care needs.from the report
  • Person-centred support

    Care plans were person centred and people had choices about their care and daily lives. Staff knew people's likes and dislikes.

    Care plans were person centred, however, further development to ensure all peoples characteristics were captured was required.from the report
  • Food and hydration

    People had a balanced diet, regular drinks and the option to request different food. Meals were freshly cooked.

    The food in the home was homemade by allocated kitchen cooks, we observed meals were cooked from fresh and desserts such as cakes were made on the day.from the report
  • Improvement work underway

    The provider had made changes to the building and had a formal plan setting out further improvements and responsibilities.

    The provider had a formal improvement plan which identified outcomes to achieve for the home and who was responsible.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicine checks and records

    serious

    Controlled medicines were not always checked as required. Some as-required guidance was missing, and some medicine records did not explain why two staff signatures were not present.

    Controlled medicines were not always checked in line with the provider's-controlled drug policy.from the report
  • Incident reporting

    serious

    The provider and manager did not always report incidents to local authorities in line with local arrangements. This was one reason the inspection was prompted.

    The registered manager and provider demonstrated a gap in knowledge and understanding regarding reporting incidents to the local authority in line with local reporting procedures.from the report
  • Management audits

    needs fixing

    Medicine audits had not identified the problems found by inspectors. This reduced assurance that the home's safety systems were working properly.

    Medicines audits in place were not effective in identifying the concerns recorded under the safe section of this report.from the report
  • Activities

    minor

    There was a planner, but people said activities did not always happen. Inspectors saw that people could become disengaged because there were too few activities.

    There was a lack of activities taking place and we found at times people were disengaged.from the report
  • Staff visibility

    needs fixing

    Inspectors saw occasions when there was no staff member or monitoring in the communal lounge. The home needed to improve how staff were positioned during the day.

    For example, we observed on a number of occasions there being no staff or monitoring in the communal lounge.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What specific changes have been made to controlled medicine checks, as-required medicine guidance and medicine administration records?
  2. 02How are falls and other incidents now reported to the local authority, and how are lessons shared with staff?
  3. 03How do you check that medicine audits identify problems before they put people at risk?
  4. 04How often do planned activities now take place, and who is responsible for making sure they happen?
  5. 05How do you ensure staff are present or monitoring communal areas throughout the day?

This was an unannounced full comprehensive inspection following concerns about falls reporting and governance; all five ratings were assessed, with Safe and Well-led rated Requires Improvement. This explanation was written from the published report of 15 March 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Castlewellan House

3 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.

  1. March 2024Requires improvementcurrent rating
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Castlewellan House

  2. January 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated
  3. May 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  4. March 2016Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  5. July 2022

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 13 July 2022.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Kingswinford

Wyncroft House

Kingswinford, DY6 · 0.2 km
Requires improvement
NursingDementia
Rated 2 years agocare home

New Bradley Hall

Kingswinford, DY6 · 1.0 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 6 years agocare home