Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home

Care @ Rainbow's End

Bosworth Farm, Main Street, Shelford, Nottingham, NG12 1EE

Goodpublished 20 May 2024, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, May 2024

Rated Inadequate and placed in special measures; inspectors found people at risk from unsafe care, poor oversight and gaps in staff training.

Inspectors visited on 16, 17 and 25 May 2023. The first visit was unannounced. They observed care, spoke with staff, relatives and professionals, and checked care records, medicines, staff files and management records.

They found serious and widespread problems. Risks were not managed properly, medicines were not always given or stored safely, and the environment was dirty. Some people were restrained without suitable plans, training or safeguards. Staff did not always recognise or report possible abuse.

Care plans were incomplete or conflicting. Staff did not always follow health and dietary guidance, including guidance designed to reduce choking risk. Mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions were not completed properly.

The home was rated Inadequate overall, and Safe, Effective and Well-led were also rated Inadequate. Caring and Responsive were not inspected in this visit, so their earlier ratings were used in the overall rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Personalised surroundings

    Inspectors found the environment homely, with people's bedrooms personalised using belongings that mattered to them.

    The environment was homely. People had personalised their own bedrooms.from the report
  • Dignified meal support

    People who needed eating and drinking aids were observed using them, and staff supported people with meals in a caring and dignified way.

    People who required support with their meals were supported in a caring and dignified way by staff.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • People at risk of avoidable harm

    serious

    Risks were not consistently assessed or managed. Fire safety and hot water concerns from the previous inspection were still present.

    This meant people were not safe and were at risk of avoidable harm.from the report
  • Unsafe restraint and safeguarding

    serious

    Staff physically moved people during some incidents without robust processes, suitable guidance or evidence of multi-agency agreement. Possible abuse and restraint incidents were not always reported.

    A person had been subject to physical restraint by staff without robust processes and procedures being in place to enable that to happen safely.from the report
  • Medicines not safely managed

    serious

    Some medicines lacked the instructions and records staff needed. Medicines were also not stored securely because keys were left beside cupboards and the room was accessible to residents.

    Medicines cupboard keys were observed to be left next to the medicine cupboards.from the report
  • Staff lacked essential skills

    serious

    Not all staff had training in areas such as communication, mental capacity, oxygen therapy, stoma care and positive behaviour support. Competence checks were incomplete.

    This left people at risk of being supported by staff without the skills to meet their needs effectively.from the report
  • Poor cleanliness

    needs fixing

    The home and equipment were visibly dirty. Bathrooms had limescale and mould, and cleaning schedules were not completed or effectively checked.

    The home and people's equipment were visibly dirty and unclean.from the report
  • Care plans and consent were incomplete

    serious

    Care plans lacked important details and sometimes conflicted with each other. Decision-specific mental capacity assessments were missing for areas including covert medicines, finances and personal care.

    Decision- specific mental capacity assessments had not been completed for all decisions where people's capacity was in doubt.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What conditions has CQC placed on the registration, and what evidence can you show that each condition is now being met?
  2. 02How are medicines now stored, recorded and administered, including covert and as-needed medicines?
  3. 03What training and competency checks have all staff completed for restraint, Makaton, oxygen therapy, stoma care and positive behaviour support?
  4. 04How are mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions now completed and reviewed, including for covert medicines and personal care?
  5. 05How are care plans, incidents, safeguarding concerns, cleaning and daily records checked by someone independent enough to identify problems?

This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led; Caring and Responsive were not inspected and their previous ratings were used in calculating the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 16 May 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Care @ Rainbow's End

5 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Inadequate.

  1. May 2024Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Inadequate

    Read what inspectors found at Care @ Rainbow's End

  2. December 2022Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. July 2022Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. February 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. December 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. April 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. June 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. August 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. March 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. November 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 24 November 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Nearby

Other care homes near Nottingham

Westwolds

Nottingham, NG14 · 2.3 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 6 years agocare home

Rivendell View

Nottingham, NG14 · 3.2 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 3 years agocare home