CQC report explained · a residential care home
Care @ Rainbow's End
Bosworth Farm, Main Street, Shelford, Nottingham, NG12 1EE
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, May 2024
Rated Inadequate and placed in special measures; inspectors found people at risk from unsafe care, poor oversight and gaps in staff training.
Inspectors visited on 16, 17 and 25 May 2023. The first visit was unannounced. They observed care, spoke with staff, relatives and professionals, and checked care records, medicines, staff files and management records.
They found serious and widespread problems. Risks were not managed properly, medicines were not always given or stored safely, and the environment was dirty. Some people were restrained without suitable plans, training or safeguards. Staff did not always recognise or report possible abuse.
Care plans were incomplete or conflicting. Staff did not always follow health and dietary guidance, including guidance designed to reduce choking risk. Mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions were not completed properly.
The home was rated Inadequate overall, and Safe, Effective and Well-led were also rated Inadequate. Caring and Responsive were not inspected in this visit, so their earlier ratings were used in the overall rating.
Personalised surroundings
Inspectors found the environment homely, with people's bedrooms personalised using belongings that mattered to them.
“The environment was homely. People had personalised their own bedrooms.” from the report
Dignified meal support
People who needed eating and drinking aids were observed using them, and staff supported people with meals in a caring and dignified way.
“People who required support with their meals were supported in a caring and dignified way by staff.” from the report
People at risk of avoidable harm
seriousRisks were not consistently assessed or managed. Fire safety and hot water concerns from the previous inspection were still present.
“This meant people were not safe and were at risk of avoidable harm.” from the report
Unsafe restraint and safeguarding
seriousStaff physically moved people during some incidents without robust processes, suitable guidance or evidence of multi-agency agreement. Possible abuse and restraint incidents were not always reported.
“A person had been subject to physical restraint by staff without robust processes and procedures being in place to enable that to happen safely.” from the report
Medicines not safely managed
seriousSome medicines lacked the instructions and records staff needed. Medicines were also not stored securely because keys were left beside cupboards and the room was accessible to residents.
“Medicines cupboard keys were observed to be left next to the medicine cupboards.” from the report
Staff lacked essential skills
seriousNot all staff had training in areas such as communication, mental capacity, oxygen therapy, stoma care and positive behaviour support. Competence checks were incomplete.
“This left people at risk of being supported by staff without the skills to meet their needs effectively.” from the report
Poor cleanliness
needs fixingThe home and equipment were visibly dirty. Bathrooms had limescale and mould, and cleaning schedules were not completed or effectively checked.
“The home and people's equipment were visibly dirty and unclean.” from the report
Care plans and consent were incomplete
seriousCare plans lacked important details and sometimes conflicted with each other. Decision-specific mental capacity assessments were missing for areas including covert medicines, finances and personal care.
“Decision- specific mental capacity assessments had not been completed for all decisions where people's capacity was in doubt.” from the report
- 01What conditions has CQC placed on the registration, and what evidence can you show that each condition is now being met?
- 02How are medicines now stored, recorded and administered, including covert and as-needed medicines?
- 03What training and competency checks have all staff completed for restraint, Makaton, oxygen therapy, stoma care and positive behaviour support?
- 04How are mental capacity assessments and best-interest decisions now completed and reviewed, including for covert medicines and personal care?
- 05How are care plans, incidents, safeguarding concerns, cleaning and daily records checked by someone independent enough to identify problems?
This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led; Caring and Responsive were not inspected and their previous ratings were used in calculating the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 16 May 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Care @ Rainbow's End
5 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Inadequate.
- May 2024Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from Requires improvementSafe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Inadequate
- December 2022Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- July 2022Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- February 2022Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- December 2018Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- April 2016GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- June 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- August 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- March 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- November 2010
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 24 November 2010.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.