Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Essex County Council

Bridgemarsh Residential Home

184 Main Road, Broomfield, Chelmsford, CM1 7AJ

Goodpublished 30 April 2020, 6 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Are people protected from harm? Staffing, medicines, infection control, safeguarding.
Effective?
Good
Does the care work? Training, consent, food and drink, working with GPs and nurses.
Caring?
Good
Are people treated with kindness and dignity?
Responsive?
Good
Is care built around the person? Care plans, activities, complaints.
Well-led?
Good
Is the service run well? The manager, the culture, how problems get found and fixed.
The report

We have not explained this report yet

The CQC published its most recent report on Bridgemarsh Residential Home on 15 April 2021. We are still reading it. Check back soon, or read the report itself on cqc.org.uk.

Read the report on cqc.org.uk
The story over the years

Every inspection of Bridgemarsh Residential Home

4 rated inspections over 4 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. April 2021Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  2. April 2020Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. January 2019Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. October 2017Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. September 2016Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. July 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. April 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. February 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. November 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 31 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Essex County Council

3 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Longwood Place

Langdon Hill, SS16
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 8 years agocare home

Magdalen Close Hostel

Clacton-on-Sea, CO15
Requires improvement
ResidentialDementia
Rated 5 months agocare home

Tudor House

Colchester, CO3
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 7 years agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Chelmsford

Madelayne Court

Chelmsford, CM1 · 0.4 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 2 years agocare home

Ayletts House

Chelmsford, CM1 · 1.0 km
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home

Okeley Care Home

Chelmsford, CM1 · 2.4 km
Good
NursingDementia
Rated 2 years agoReport explained