CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Mercer Care
Bramhall
1 Butt Lane, Tattershall, Lincoln, LN4 4NL
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. Inspectors found enough staff, clear risk plans, safe medicines management and good infection control.
- Effective?
- Good
- This question was not inspected during this focused visit. Its previous rating was carried forward to calculate the overall rating.
- Caring?
- Good
- This question was not inspected during this focused visit. Its previous rating was carried forward to calculate the overall rating.
- Responsive?
- Good
- This question was not inspected during this focused visit. Its previous rating was carried forward to calculate the overall rating.
- Well-led?
- Good
- The home had an open culture and systems for checking the quality and safety of care. People and staff were able to share their views, and lessons from incidents and complaints were shared with staff.
What inspectors found, December 2023
Bramhall was rated Good; inspectors found safe care and strong management, but this visit did not reassess all areas of care.
This was an unannounced, focused inspection on 22 November 2023. Inspectors spoke with people living at the home, relatives, visitors and staff. They observed care and checked care, medicine, staff and management records.
The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, suitable risk plans, safe medicines, good cleanliness and appropriate infection control. They also found that incidents were reviewed and that the manager used checks and people's views to improve care.
The overall rating stayed Good, the same as at the previous inspection on 15 March 2018. This visit looked only at Safe and Well-led. The ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive were carried forward from the earlier inspection.
Enough staff
Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs promptly. People said call bells were answered within a minute and staff were available at night.
“People told us there were enough staff to meet their needs and call bells were answered within a minute.” from the report
Safe medicines
Medicines were ordered in good time, stored safely and given as prescribed. Staff had received medicine administration training.
“Systems were in place to ensure medicines were ordered in a timely fashion and stored safely so they were available when people needed.” from the report
Good safety checks
Risks were identified in care plans, with detailed instructions for staff. Incidents such as falls and pressure areas were reviewed for patterns and improvements.
“Incidents were then reviewed monthly to see if there were any trends which indicated areas for improvement.” from the report
Open management
People could raise concerns with the manager, and surveys were used to identify possible improvements. The manager was open with people and relatives when incidents happened.
“People were happy they could voice their thoughts on the care they received and were listened to.” from the report
Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.
- 01What were the previous ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive, and when will these areas next be inspected?
- 02How will you assess and update my relative's risks, including their equipment and emergency evacuation needs?
- 03How do you check that medicines are ordered on time, stored safely and given in line with prescriptions?
- 04What action has been taken after recent falls, pressure areas or other incidents involving residents?
- 05How will my relative and our family be able to raise concerns and see what action has been taken?
This was an unannounced focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive were carried forward from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 20 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Bramhall
3 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.
- December 2023Goodcurrent ratingstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- March 2018Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodWell-led: Good
- October 2015GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- September 2014
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 26 September 2014.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.