CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Advinia Healthcare
Bishop's Cleeve Care Home
Bishops Cleeve Care Home, Ruby Avenue, Bishops Cleeve, Cheltenham, GL52 7ZN
Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.
What inspectors found, January 2024
Requires Improvement; inspectors found risks, medicines and management systems were not always safe or effective.
This was an unannounced focused inspection on 14 and 15 November 2023. Inspectors reviewed safe, effective and well-led care. They spoke with people, relatives, staff and visiting professionals, and checked care records, medicines, staff files and management records.
People and relatives generally said people felt safe and received good care. Inspectors also found important shortfalls. Risk assessments and staff guidance were not always clear, medicines were not always managed safely, and some people were not supported in line with their choices or legal rights.
The home was rated Requires Improvement overall. Safe, effective and well-led were each rated Requires Improvement. Caring and responsive were not inspected during this visit, so their previous ratings carried over when the overall rating was calculated.
The provider breached regulations covering safe care and treatment, safeguarding and improper treatment, person-centred care, and good governance. The provider was given warning notices for safe care and treatment and good governance. The provider paused admissions for four weeks after the inspection and was asked to provide an action plan.
People felt safe
People and relatives consistently said they felt safe. Inspectors also saw staff respond promptly to meals and support needs.
“People and relatives told us they felt people were safe and that the care provided was good.” from the report
Clean environment
Inspectors found the home clean and without unpleasant smells. People and relatives also praised the cleanliness of rooms and the environment.
“We observed the home to be clean and there were no malodours.” from the report
Safe recruitment
The required checks were completed before new staff started work, including criminal record checks.
“Staff were recruited safely. All required checks were made before new staff began working at the home.” from the report
Access to healthcare
People were supported to access GPs, dentists, opticians, chiropody and other health professionals. Visiting healthcare professionals gave positive feedback.
“Records showed people were supported to access support from healthcare professionals such as speech and language therapists, occupational therapists and physiotherapists.” from the report
Early management action
The interim manager had identified shortfalls and started actions, including reviewing incidents, improving communication and making missing legal referrals.
“The interim manager had taken immediate action to improve communication and governance processes.” from the report
Risk management
seriousRisk assessments and reviews for eating and drinking, mobility, falls and moving and handling were not always robust. Staff did not always have clear guidance on how to keep people safe.
“People's risks were not always robustly assessed and reviewed.” from the report
Medicines
seriousMedicine patches, 'when required' medicines, expiry dates and a cream not listed on the medicine record were not always managed safely. One person's medicines were given in a way that did not follow their plan.
“Medicines are not always managed safely for people living at the service.” from the report
Mental capacity and liberty safeguards
seriousTen of 19 people identified as needing legal referrals had not been referred until inspectors asked about this. Some mental capacity records were also incomplete or not decision-specific.
“This placed people at risk of unlawful deprivation of their liberty.” from the report
Person-centred care
needs fixingPeople were not always involved in their care or supported to make choices. Inspectors saw limited meaningful engagement, including periods of up to 45 minutes for some people living with dementia.
“We observed people living with dementia going for periods of time, sometimes 45 minutes, without any meaningful engagement from staff.” from the report
Weak oversight
seriousAudits had not been carried out routinely since August 2023. There were no effective audits for medicines, clinical governance or care plans, and there was no clear service improvement plan.
“There were no audit processes in relation to the management of medicines, clinical governance and care plan audits.” from the report
Fire and infection checks
seriousSystems did not ensure fire and legionella checks continued when the responsible person was absent. Hazardous substances were accessible, and infection control audits were not being completed.
“The service had not implemented a system to ensure fire and legionella safety checks were being carried out in the absence of the person responsible for completing these.” from the report
- 01What has changed to make risk assessments and staff guidance clear for falls, mobility, moving and handling, and eating and drinking?
- 02How are you checking that medicines are given exactly as each person's plan requires, including patches and 'when required' medicines?
- 03Have all people who need a Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards referral now been referred, and are mental capacity assessments decision-specific?
- 04What audits are now being completed for medicines, care plans, clinical governance, fire safety and infection control?
- 05How will people living with dementia receive regular meaningful engagement and have their choices acted on?
This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led only; Caring and Responsive were not inspected during this visit and their previous ratings carried over into the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 17 January 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Bishop's Cleeve Care Home
2 rated inspections over a year: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.
- January 2024Requires improvementcurrent ratingdown from GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- August 2022GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Outstanding
- February 2022
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 1 February 2022.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.