CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Dolphin Homes
Beachview
28 Alleyne Way, Middleton-on-Sea, PO22 6JZ
Rated Good: inspectors found the service performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, January 2024
Rated Inadequate; inspectors found serious concerns about safety, staffing, medicines and leadership.
This was an unannounced focused inspection. Inspectors visited on 14 March and 25 March 2023, with a medicines visit on 20 April. They spoke with people, staff, relatives and professionals. They reviewed care records, medicines records, staffing and management systems.
The home was rated Inadequate overall. Safe and well-led were rated Inadequate, while effective was rated Requires Improvement. Inspectors found unsafe risk management, too few staff at times, gaps in medicines records, poor communication and weak oversight.
Some care was kind and people were supported with meals, medicines and health appointments. People's rooms were personalised and staff had completed training in several important areas. However, inspectors could not be assured that people's choices, safety and care needs were consistently respected.
The overall rating had fallen from Requires Improvement at the previous inspection. This inspection did not assess Caring or Responsive. Those areas were not inspected, and their previous ratings were used in calculating the overall rating.
Recruitment checks
The provider's recruitment process included references and DBS checks to help ensure suitable staff were employed.
“The provider had a recruitment system that ensured only suitable staff were employed.” from the report
Personalised rooms
People's rooms reflected their interests and belongings. The lounge was also described as spacious and pleasantly decorated.
“Peoples' rooms were personalised and individually decorated with things important to them, for example TV's, gaming equipment, pictures and photographs.” from the report
Some training completed
Records showed staff had training in areas including safeguarding, learning disabilities, person-centred care, medicines and mental capacity.
“Records showed staff had received training in topics including learning disabilities, person-centred care, safeguarding and protection of adults, medication, documentation and record keeping, MCA and DoLS.” from the report
Support with meals
People who needed help with meals were supported by staff, although inspectors found confusion about some people's food and drink needs.
“People who needed help with their meals were supported by staff.” from the report
Unsafe risk management
seriousCare plans did not consistently explain how to manage risks. Staff gave conflicting advice about moving and handling, including whether a person should use a hoist.
“Systems were either not in place or robust enough to demonstrate risk was effectively managed. This placed people at risk of harm.” from the report
Too few staff
seriousStaffing levels were not always enough to meet people's needs. One person had to wait in wet clothing because two staff were needed and were not available.
“The provider had failed to ensure there were sufficient numbers of staff deployed. This placed people at risk of harm.” from the report
Medicines records
seriousMedicine stocks did not always match the records. Storage checks and recording of medicines were also inconsistent, so inspectors could not be assured that medicines were always given as prescribed.
“However, we were not assured that medicines were always administered as documented, due to the number of medicines within the service, not always matching recorded stock balances.” from the report
Safeguarding and dignity
seriousInspectors heard concerns about verbal abuse and about people not always receiving suitable personal care. Staff did not always feel safe reporting concerns.
“At this inspection we found people were exposed to the risk of harm and abuse including verbal abuse.” from the report
Weak leadership
seriousThere was no registered manager, with frequent changes in managers. Staff described low morale and a blame culture, while audits failed to identify important gaps.
“The provider's systems and processes were ineffective and failed to identify concerns found on this inspection.” from the report
Food and drink information
needs fixingStaff were unclear about choking risks, food textures and thickened drinks. Inspectors found that important information was not always communicated consistently.
“There is confusion to what textures [Name] can have, so they're coming in tomorrow.” from the report
- 01How many staff are now on duty at different times, and how do you check that staffing is enough for people's individual needs?
- 02What has changed to make sure moving and handling instructions are accurate, current and followed by every member of staff?
- 03How do you now check medicines stocks, storage temperatures, expiry dates and changes to prescriptions?
- 04How are choking risks, food textures, thickened drinks and specialist feeding needs recorded and communicated to all staff?
- 05Who is currently managing the home, and how are staff and relatives able to raise concerns safely and receive a response?
This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led only; Caring and Responsive were not inspected and their previous ratings carried over into the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 4 January 2024 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Beachview
4 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Inadequate.
- January 2024Inadequatecurrent ratingdown from Requires improvementSafe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Inadequate
- October 2022Requires improvementdown from GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- November 2018Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Good
- December 2016GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- October 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- October 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- July 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- September 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- November 2011
Report published without a new overall rating.
- December 2010
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 31 December 2010.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.
Other services run by Dolphin Homes Limited
12 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.