CQC report explained · a residential care home, run by Coate Water Care Company
Arbory Residential Home
London Road, Andover Down, Andover, SP11 6LR
Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.
What inspectors found, October 2023
Arbory Residential Home is rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found ongoing safety, staffing and care concerns, while leadership was rated Inadequate.
This was an unannounced focused inspection after concerns about care quality, safety, cleanliness and staffing. Inspectors visited on 14, 15 and 23 August 2023. They spoke with people, relatives and staff, and checked medicines, care plans, recruitment records and management records.
The home remained in breach of rules about safe care, staffing, consent, premises and governance. Inspectors found medicines were sometimes unavailable or not properly planned for, risks were not always managed, staffing was not always sufficient, and parts of the home were dirty or poorly maintained.
People did not always receive personalised care or regular meaningful activities. Care records were sometimes incomplete or conflicting. The rating for Effective fell from Good to Requires Improvement, while Well-led fell from Requires Improvement to Inadequate. Safe remained Requires Improvement.
People felt safe
People and relatives generally said they felt safe and well looked after. Staff understood how to protect people from abuse.
“Overall relatives felt their family member was safe.” from the report
Some medicine practices
Medicines were stored securely. People and relatives generally felt medicines were managed well.
“Medicines were appropriately stored and secure.” from the report
Training response
Most staff were up to date with the training offered. Practical workshops after a choking incident helped staff respond more confidently.
“Staff had subsequently been able to respond confidently when another choking incident occurred.” from the report
Food and drink
People and relatives generally spoke positively about the food. Fluid records showed people received drinks in line with their assessed needs.
“Records we reviewed showed people received fluid in line with their assessed needs.” from the report
Risks and medicines
seriousRisks such as pressure damage were not always managed. Medicines were sometimes unavailable, allergies were often missing from records, and staff were not trained to give one emergency medicine.
“10 service users had missed a total of 24 doses in July 2023 due to medicines not being available.” from the report
Not enough staff
seriousThere were not always enough care, housekeeping or activity staff. Inspectors found people needing continence care and mealtime support, and activities were limited.
“There were not always sufficient numbers of staff deployed to meet people's needs.” from the report
Cleanliness and maintenance
seriousSome areas and equipment were dirty or poorly maintained. Inspectors found soiled items, a strong smell of urine, unsafe garden areas and an unreliable nurse call system.
“One person's bed rail bumpers were soiled, and we found 4 people's mattresses were heavily soiled increasing people's exposure to infection.” from the report
Consent procedures
seriousThe home did not consistently follow legal requirements for consent and mental capacity decisions. In most reviewed cases, consent forms had been signed by people without the legal authority to do so.
“In relation to the 10 people we reviewed, we found in all but 3 cases, consent forms had been signed by third parties who did not have a legal right to provide consent.” from the report
Weak oversight
seriousManagement checks had not led to the improvements required after the previous inspection. Records and policies were incomplete, and feedback was not consistently listened to or acted on.
“These new and continuing regulatory breaches indicated a provider failure to identify and address concerns and deliver an improvement culture through their own internal monitoring systems.” from the report
- 01What has changed in staffing levels, including housekeeping and activities staff, since the inspection?
- 02How do you now check that medicines are available, allergies are recorded and emergency medicines can be given safely?
- 03How are mental capacity assessments, best-interest decisions and consent forms being checked?
- 04What repairs and cleaning work has been completed, including the nurse call system, garden, bathrooms and mattresses?
- 05What regular, personalised activities are now available for people living with dementia?
This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led only; the Caring and Responsive ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 14 October 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Arbory Residential Home
5 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has slipped, from Good to Requires improvement.
- October 2023Requires improvementcurrent ratingstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Inadequate
- February 2023Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- January 2021Inspected but not ratedSafe: Inspected but not rated
- December 2020Goodstayed GoodSafe: Requires improvementWell-led: Good
- April 2018Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodWell-led: Good
- February 2016GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- March 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- September 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- April 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- November 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- May 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- September 2011
Report published without a new overall rating.
- May 2011
Report published without a new overall rating.
- November 2010
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 25 November 2010.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.
Or stay at home with a private carer
Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.