Skip to content
CQC ExplainedEvery inspection report, in plain English

CQC report explained · a nursing home, run by Apex Care Homes

Alicia Nursing Home

105-115 and 33-35 Marsh Road, Luton, LU3 2QG

Requires improvementpublished 17 June 2025, 14 months ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the service was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2023

Alicia Nursing Home was rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found kind care but safety checks, medicines processes and management systems were not reliable enough.

Inspectors visited without notice on three days in August and September 2023. They spoke with people, relatives and staff, and checked care records, medicines, recruitment records, infection control and quality checks.

People were treated with kindness and respect. Staff supported people patiently, offered activities and helped people make choices. People and relatives gave positive feedback about the care and staff.

However, some safety risks were not properly identified or managed. Window restrictors were missing in the second building, blood glucose devices were not checked as instructed, and some medicines records were incomplete. Quality checks did not identify these problems, and the home breached Regulations 15 and 17.

The overall rating changed from Good at the previous inspection in 2017 to Requires Improvement. The provider acted immediately on some issues during and after the inspection, but CQC said it would continue to monitor the home.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful care

    Inspectors saw staff treating people with patience and kindness. People and relatives spoke positively about the care.

    Staff were very caring towards people and talked about them with affection.from the report
  • People felt safe from abuse

    Staff understood how to recognise and report abuse. The report says people felt safe and safeguarding policies were in place.

    People were protected from the risk of harm and abuse and people felt safe.from the report
  • Activities and independence

    People had opportunities for activities, community outings and social engagement. Care plans recorded the support people needed to remain independent.

    People were given lots of opportunities for activities and engagement.from the report
  • Enough staff

    Rotas showed there were enough staff to support people, including people who needed one-to-one support.

    There were enough staff to support people, including where individuals received one to one support.from the report
  • Good partnership working

    Staff involved other professionals promptly when needed, including GPs, speech and language services and palliative care services.

    The provider had good relationships with other professionals that worked alongside the service.from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Unsafe windows and equipment checks

    serious

    Windows in the second building could be opened wide enough for someone to climb out and fall. Blood glucose monitoring devices were not checked according to the manufacturer's instructions.

    The height of the windows posed a risk of someone accidently falling from them as they could be opened wide enough for a person to easily climb up and out.from the report
  • Medicines records and practice

    needs fixing

    Some medicines did not have opening dates recorded, and staff were unclear about expiry dates after opening. Insulin injection sites were not recorded.

    Medicines were not always managed safely. For example, some medicines did not have opening dates recorded and staff were unclear in relation to expiry dates of medicine once opened.from the report
  • Weak quality monitoring

    serious

    The home's audits and checklists did not identify the problems found by inspectors. Some audits were overdue or had not been completed in line with the home's policy.

    Governance processes were not always effective at ensuring the quality and safety of the service.from the report
  • Limited learning from incidents

    needs fixing

    The home reviewed incidents, but there was limited evidence of looking for wider patterns or taking follow-up action for some incidents.

    There was no evidence of a detailed analysis over time to capture wider themes and trendsfrom the report
  • Restrictions not regularly reviewed

    needs fixing

    Some kitchens, bedrooms and stairs were locked or gated in the second building. The provider had not regularly checked whether these restrictions were still the least restrictive options.

    The provider had not kept restrictions to people under regular review to ensure they remained the least restrictive options.from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What evidence can you show that all windows in the second building now have suitable restrictors and that they are checked regularly?
  2. 02How are blood glucose monitoring devices now calibrated and checked, and how is this recorded?
  3. 03How do you record medicine opening dates, expiry dates and insulin injection sites?
  4. 04How often are medicines, safety and quality audits completed, and who checks that identified problems are put right?
  5. 05Which restrictions in the second building have been removed or changed, and how are remaining restrictions reviewed as people's needs change?

This inspection looked in detail at Safe, Caring and Well-led; the report says ratings for key questions not inspected were carried over from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 2 November 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Alicia Nursing Home

5 rated inspections over 9 years: the service has improved, from Inadequate to Requires improvement.

  1. November 2023Requires improvementcurrent rating
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Alicia Nursing Home

  2. March 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. November 2020Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not ratedWell-led: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. October 2017Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodCaring: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. September 2016Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. July 2015Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. March 2015Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: InadequateResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. April 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. January 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. February 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. November 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 5 November 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission. A service can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections, not every contact the CQC has had with the service.

Another option

Or stay at home with a private carer

Many people who look at care homes end up staying at home with a carer who comes in for a few hours a day, or lives in. PrimeCarers introduces you to self-employed carers you choose yourself: interviewed, ID and DBS checked, from about £20 an hour or £1,120 a week live-in.

Same provider

Other services run by Apex Care Homes Limited

3 other services on the CQC register. A pattern across a group tells you more than one report.

Bunyan Lodge

Bedford, MK40
Good
Residential
Rated 7 years agocare home
Nearby

Other care homes near Luton

Milliner House

Luton, LU3 · 0.4 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 2 years agocare home

Mulberry Court

Luton, LU3 · 1.0 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 5 years agocare home

Collinson Care Home

Luton, LU4 · 1.2 km
Good
ResidentialDementia
Rated 2 years agoReport explained